KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Payment of bonus

Labour and Industrial Law I · Unit V · Topic 14 of 14 · 8 min read

How bonus grew from wartime ex gratia payments into a statutory right, eligibility and disqualification, the minimum and maximum bonus, allocable and available surplus, set-on and set-off, new and public sector establishments and penalties under Chapter IV of the Code on Wages 2019.

On this page
  1. 1. Evolution
  2. 2. Scope and applicability
  3. 3. Key definitions
  4. 4. Eligibility and disqualification
  5. 5. Minimum and maximum bonus
  6. 6. Set-on and set-off: section 36
  7. 7. Special provisions for certain establishments
  8. 8. Payment, disputes, offences and penalties
  9. 9. Problem
  10. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The structure in one sentence. Every eligible employee gets at least 8.33 per cent of wages (or ₹100) whether or not the employer made a profit; if the profits allow it, up to 20 per cent; and good and bad years are evened out by set-on and set-off. Chapter IV of the Code on Wages, 2019 (sections 26 to 41) replaces the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, whose sections are given in brackets.

1. Evolution

Bonus began in 1917 as a “war bonus”, an ex gratia payment by Bombay textile mills during the First World War. When employers tried to stop it, disputes followed, and industrial tribunals began to treat bonus as a claim workers could make where profits allowed. In 1950 the Labour Appellate Tribunal laid down the Full Bench Formula in the Bombay mill owners’ case: bonus is payable out of the profit left after prior charges such as depreciation, a return on capital and reserves. In Muir Mills Co. v. Suti Mills Mazdoor Union, 1954 INSC 111, AIR 1955 SC 170, the Supreme Court refused to treat bonus as deferred wages and tied the claim to profits.

The Bonus Commission (1961) recommended legislation, and Parliament enacted the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, which made a minimum bonus payable even without profits. Its validity was upheld in substance in Jalan Trading Co. v. Mill Mazdoor Union, 1966 INSC 131, AIR 1967 SC 691. In Sanghi Jeevaraj Ghewar Chand v. Secretary, Madras Chillies, Grains Kirana Merchants Workers Union, 1968 INSC 155, AIR 1969 SC 530, the Court held the Act to be an exhaustive code on profit-based bonus, so excluded establishments cannot claim it outside the Act. But in Mumbai Kamgar Sabha v. Abdulbhai Faizullabhai, 1976 INSC 49, (1976) 3 SCC 832, the Court held that the Act does not bar customary bonus or bonus based on conditions of service, which rest on a different footing.

2. Scope and applicability

3. Key definitions

Audited company accounts are normally not to be questioned, and the authority may call for the balance sheet but not disclose it without the employer’s consent (section 31(2), (3)). In a dispute, audited accounts of companies and corporations are presumed accurate (section 47) [s.23].

4. Eligibility and disqualification

An employee is eligible if he draws wages not exceeding the amount notified by the appropriate Government and has worked at least thirty days in the accounting year (section 26(1)) [s.8]. For calculation, wages above a notified figure are treated as that figure or the minimum wage, whichever is higher (section 26(2)) [s.12]. The Code leaves both figures to notification; under the 1965 Act as amended in 2015 they were ₹21,000 a month for eligibility and ₹7,000 for calculation.

An employee dismissed from service for any of the following is disqualified (section 29) [s.9]:

Where an employee has not worked all the working days, the minimum bonus is reduced in proportion (section 27) [s.13]. Days of lay-off, paid leave, temporary disablement from an employment accident and paid maternity leave count as days worked (section 28) [s.14].

5. Minimum and maximum bonus

6. Set-on and set-off: section 36

[s.15 and the Fourth Schedule.]

So a loss-making employer must still pay 8.33 per cent, but recovers it from later surpluses through set-off.

7. Special provisions for certain establishments

8. Payment, disputes, offences and penalties

9. Problem

A factory with 60 workers made a loss in 2025–26. It refuses bonus to all workers. Among them, A joined on 1 March 2026 and worked 25 days; B was dismissed in January 2026 for assaulting a supervisor on the shop floor; C worked the full year. Advise.

Issue. Whether bonus is payable in a loss year, and to whom.

Law. Section 26(1) makes the minimum bonus payable whether or not there is an allocable surplus, to employees within the notified wage limit who have worked at least thirty days. Section 29 disqualifies an employee dismissed for riotous or violent behaviour on the premises. Section 36(2) lets the employer carry the deficiency forward for set-off.

Application. A worked only 25 days and is not eligible. B was dismissed for violent behaviour on the premises and is disqualified. C is eligible; the loss is no defence, since the minimum bonus does not depend on profit. The factory can set off what it pays against surpluses in the next four years.

Conclusion. C (and every other eligible worker) must be paid at least 8.33 per cent of wages earned, or ₹100 if higher, within eight months of 31 March 2026. A and B get nothing. Non-payment can be pursued as a claim under section 45 or as an industrial dispute under section 46.

How this is examined

Bonus is usually a short note or a problem (eligibility, a loss year, a new establishment, whether a bonus dispute is an industrial dispute). For an essay: evolution from war bonus to the Full Bench Formula and the 1965 Act, applicability and exclusions, available and allocable surplus, eligibility and the four disqualifications, minimum and maximum, set-on and set-off, new establishments and the public sector, time limit and penalties. Name the Code section first and the 1965 section in brackets, and note that the 1965 Act was repealed by section 69 of the Code.

Now try the real questions: Labour and Industrial Law I past question papers.