KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Record of rights, mutation and patta book, and realisation of land revenue

Land Law · Unit III · Topic 11 of 18 · 9 min read

The record of rights (RTC) and register of mutations under Chapter XI of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, the presumption and its limits, appeal and revision against mutation entries, the patta book, and the process for recovering arrears of land revenue under Chapter XIV, with the khata-transfer and revenue-auction problems solved.

On this page
  1. 1. The record of rights: section 127
  2. 2. Reporting and mutation: sections 128 and 129
  3. 3. Patta book: section 129A
  4. 4. Evidentiary value: sections 130 to 135
  5. 5. Appeal and revision: section 136
  6. 6. Problem: khata in the wrong name
  7. 7. Realisation of land revenue: sections 157 to 192
  8. 8. Problem: the auction purchaser and old arrears
  9. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. Two chapters, both heavily examined. Chapter XI (sections 127 to 136) explains how the record of rights (the RTC or pahani) is kept and changed by mutation; the key rule is that an entry is presumed correct but does not create title. Chapter XIV (sections 157 to 192) explains who pays land revenue and how arrears are recovered; the key rule for problems is that a revenue-sale purchaser is not liable for arrears before the sale (section 182).

1. The record of rights: section 127

A record of rights is prepared for every village and includes:

Completion is notified in the Gazette. In Karnataka the record is kept digitally under the Bhoomi project. Karnataka Act 14 of 2026 inserted section 127(4), allowing Tahsildars in Kodagu to correct entries transferred under a 2000 circular from the Jamabandi register to columns 9 and 12 of the RTC, after inquiry and subject to appeal (the commencement date was not stated in the official consolidated text at the time of writing).

2. Reporting and mutation: sections 128 and 129

3. Patta book: section 129A

Every holder of agricultural land, including a tenant primarily liable for land revenue, is supplied with a patta book containing a copy of his record of rights, the land revenue and other dues paid, and details of cultivation and crops as shown in village records. It is prepared, issued and maintained under rules, which may prescribe fees. Under section 133, an entry in the patta book carries the same presumption as the record of rights.

4. Evidentiary value: sections 130 to 135

The presumption is rebuttable and fiscal in character. In Suraj Bhan v. Financial Commissioner, 2007 INSC 424, (2007) 6 SCC 186, the Supreme Court reiterated that an entry in revenue records does not confer title; mutation serves fiscal purposes (who pays the land revenue), and title must be decided by a competent civil court.

5. Appeal and revision: section 136

6. Problem: khata in the wrong name

Gurappa bought 2 acres 24 guntas in Sy. No. 17/5 from Lakshmidevi by a registered sale deed. He died without getting the khata changed. After Lakshmidevi’s death her daughter Manavi got a pavathi (inheritance) khata entered in her own name. Gurappa’s son Chalapathi now applies for khata in his name; the Tahsildar refuses because the RTC stands in Manavi’s name. Advise Chalapathi. (April 2023)

Issue. Whether Chalapathi can get the record corrected, and by what route.

Law. A buyer under a registered deed is exempt from reporting, and the registering authority must report the transfer (section 128). Mutation entries are presumed true only until the contrary is proved (section 133) and do not confer title (Suraj Bhan). An entry may be challenged in appeal within sixty days of knowledge (section 136(2)) or in revision before the Deputy Commissioner (section 136(3)); a declaratory suit lies against the person denying title (section 135).

Application. Lakshmidevi ceased to own the land when she sold it to Gurappa. Manavi inherited nothing in Sy. No. 17/5, so the pavathi entry rests on an extinct title. Chalapathi takes the land by inheritance from Gurappa and is entitled to report that under section 128. He should produce the registered sale deed and Gurappa’s death certificate and file an appeal to the Assistant Commissioner against the certified entry in Manavi’s favour, within sixty days of learning of it, or seek revision by the Deputy Commissioner. Section 129(2) required written intimation to everyone appearing to be interested; if the entry was certified without notice to Gurappa’s heirs, that is a further ground.

Conclusion. Chalapathi can get the khata corrected through section 136. If Manavi disputes the sale itself, the question is one of title for the civil court, and Chalapathi should sue her for a declaration under the proviso to section 135; the RTC will then be corrected under section 132(3). The same reasoning answers the similar April 2023 problem where a buyer’s son seeks khata after the vendor’s son has already got a pavathi khata.

7. Realisation of land revenue: sections 157 to 192

8. Problem: the auction purchaser and old arrears

Ramappa bought 5 acres of Smt. Renuka’s land at a public auction held by the Tahsildar in 2022 for ₹20 lakh. The sale was confirmed and a certificate of purchase issued. Renuka had not paid land revenue for 2021. Is Ramappa liable for it? (August 2024)

Issue. Whether a certified purchaser at a revenue sale is liable for arrears that accrued before the sale.

Law. Section 157 makes the occupant primarily liable. Section 158 gives the State’s claim priority over the land. But section 182 provides that a purchaser to whom a certificate of purchase has been granted is not liable for land revenue for any period prior to the date of sale. Section 181 applies the sale proceeds first to the arrears and costs.

Application. Ramappa holds a certificate under section 179, which operates as a valid transfer. The 2021 revenue is for a period before the 2022 sale. The State’s remedy for it was against Renuka, and it is satisfied out of the auction proceeds before any surplus is paid to her.

Conclusion. Ramappa is not liable for the 2021 land revenue. He is liable only from the date of sale. Had he bought privately from Renuka, the land would have passed subject to the paramount charge under section 87, and the answer would be different.

How this is examined

“Explain the process of realisation of land revenue” (January 2026) uses section 7. “Record of rights” (August 2024, April 2023, November 2021) and “patta book” (August 2024, 100-mark paper) are short notes: sections 1 to 5. The khata and auction problems above were set in April 2023 and August 2024.

Now try the real questions: Land Law past question papers.