KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Control of the RBI over non-banking companies, financial and non-financial

Banking Law · Unit II · Topic 6 of 21 · 6 min read

Chapter IIIB of the RBI Act: who is a non-banking institution, a financial institution and an NBFC, the principal business test, registration and net owned fund, reserve fund and liquid assets, directions, prohibition and winding up, the Peerless and crypto cases, and how deposits by non-financial companies are dealt with.

On this page
  1. 1. Why non-banking companies need control
  2. 2. The definitions (s.45-I)
  3. 3. Registration and prudential controls
  4. 4. Information and directions to non-banking institutions generally
  5. 5. Sanctions
  6. 6. The cases
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. Banks are not the only bodies that take deposits and lend. The RBI's power over the rest comes from Chapter IIIB of the RBI Act, 1934 (ss.45-I to 45QB), inserted in 1963 and strengthened in 1997 after a series of finance company failures. Learn the three definitions in s.45-I, then the controls in the order registration, prudential rules, directions, sanctions.

1. Why non-banking companies need control

Finance companies, hire-purchase and leasing firms, chit funds and investment companies collect money from the public and lend it, but are not banks: they do not take deposits withdrawable by cheque, so the Banking Regulation Act does not reach them. When they fail, depositors lose everything; there is no deposit insurance. They also affect the credit system the RBI is trying to steer. Chapter IIIB therefore gives the RBI power to register, regulate and, if necessary, wind them up. Chapter IIIB does not apply to banks, RRBs, co-operative banks or primary credit societies, which have their own law (s.45H).

2. The definitions (s.45-I)

The principal business test is not defined in the Act. The RBI applies it by its “50-50” criterion: a company is treated as an NBFC if its financial assets are more than half its total assets and income from financial assets is more than half its gross income.

The syllabus speaks of financial companies and non-financial companies. The first are NBFCs, controlled under Chapter IIIB. The second are manufacturing and trading companies whose principal business is not finance; when they accept deposits they are governed by ss.73–76 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014, not by the RBI. Unregulated deposit schemes of any kind are banned by the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019.

3. Registration and prudential controls

4. Information and directions to non-banking institutions generally

Two older powers reach beyond NBFCs:

Every non-banking institution must comply (s.45M), and auditors must report contraventions to the RBI (s.45MA).

5. Sanctions

6. The cases

In Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. v. Reserve Bank of India, 1992 INSC 32, the Court upheld the RBI's directions to residuary non-banking companies, which required them to invest the whole of their deposit liability in safe instruments such as bank deposits and government securities. The directions were issued under ss.45J, 45K and 45L to protect small depositors, and the Court refused to examine their wisdom: the RBI is the expert body, and its monetary and credit judgments are not reviewed on merits unless they are arbitrary.

The breadth of the RBI's regulatory power was considered in Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India, 2020 INSC 264, (2020) 10 SCC 274. The RBI's 2018 circular forbade the entities it regulates to deal with persons dealing in virtual currencies. The Court held that the RBI had the power to regulate or prohibit such an activity, since it could affect the payment and credit systems, but struck the circular down as disproportionate under Article 19(1)(g): the RBI had not shown any actual harm to its regulated entities and had not considered less intrusive measures.

Trap. Do not say NBFC deposits are insured. DICGC cover is only for deposits with banks. A depositor of an NBFC is protected by registration, prudential norms and the RBI's sanctions, not by insurance; that is why the syllabus groups NBFC control with deposit insurance in the same unit.

How this is examined

“Discuss the powers of Reserve Bank of India over non-banking companies” (August 2024) is the essay. Give the reasons for control, the three definitions, the registration and prudential controls with section numbers, directions under ss.45JA, 45K and 45L, the sanctions, and Peerless. Add the distinction between financial companies (RBI) and non-financial companies (Companies Act, 2013), because the syllabus names both. IAMAI makes a good closing paragraph on the limits of RBI power.

Now try the real questions: Banking Law past question papers.