KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 and the constitution of the NHRC

Human Rights Law and Practice · Unit IV · Topic 12 of 18 · 8 min read

Why the 1993 Act was passed, its scheme and key definitions, and the constitution of the National Human Rights Commission as it stands after the 2006 and 2019 amendments: composition, deemed members, the selection committee, term, removal and staff.

On this page
  1. 1. Background
  2. 2. Scheme of the Act
  3. 3. Key definitions: section 2(1)
  4. 4. Composition of the NHRC: section 3
  5. 5. Appointment: section 4
  6. 6. Removal: section 5
  7. 7. Term and conditions: sections 6 to 8
  8. 8. Staff: section 11
  9. 9. Summary of the 2019 amendments
  10. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “Discuss the constitution, powers and functions of the NHRC” and “important provisions of the Protection of Human Rights Act” are the two Unit IV essays, set in every recent paper. This note covers the Act’s background and the constitution of the Commission; the next covers functions, powers and procedure. Use the text as amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2019, in force from 2 August 2019. Older textbooks give the pre-2019 composition and five-year terms, which are wrong now.

1. Background

By 1993 there was pressure from within and outside India for an independent body to examine complaints against the police and security forces. The UN General Assembly adopted the Paris Principles on national human rights institutions (resolution 48/134, 20 December 1993), which require such institutions to have a broad mandate, independence guaranteed by law, pluralist composition and adequate resources. India issued the Protection of Human Rights Ordinance, 1993, and replaced it by the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (Act 10 of 1994), which received assent on 8 January 1994 and is deemed to have come into force on 28 September 1993 (section 1(3)). The NHRC was set up on 12 October 1993. The Act has been amended in 2000, 2006 and 2019.

2. Scheme of the Act

3. Key definitions: section 2(1)

4. Composition of the NHRC: section 3

Section 3(1) requires the Central Government to constitute the Commission. Under section 3(2) it consists of:

Deemed Members, section 3(3). The Chairpersons of the National Commission for Backward Classes, the National Commission for Minorities, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes and the National Commission for Women, and the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, are deemed Members for the discharge of the functions in clauses (b) to (j) of section 12. The NCBC, the NCPCR and the Chief Commissioner were added in 2019. Deemed Members do not take part in the inquiry function under section 12(a).

Secretary-General, section 3(4). The chief executive officer, who, subject to the control of the Chairperson, exercises all administrative and financial powers, except judicial functions and the power to make regulations under section 40B (as amended in 2019). Headquarters, section 3(5): Delhi, with offices elsewhere with the approval of the Central Government.

So the Commission has a Chairperson, five full-time Members and seven deemed Members.

5. Appointment: section 4

The Chairperson and Members are appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal, after obtaining the recommendations of a committee of:

No sitting Judge of the Supreme Court or sitting Chief Justice of a High Court may be appointed except after consultation with the Chief Justice of India (second proviso). Under section 4(2), no appointment is invalid merely because of a vacancy in the committee.

A point to make in the critique. Four of the six members of the committee are usually from the government side (the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Speaker and, in most Houses, the Deputy Chairman). The Opposition’s two votes cannot prevent an appointment. Critics, and the Paris Principles’ emphasis on independence and pluralism, are why this is regularly discussed in answers on the NHRC’s effectiveness.

6. Removal: section 5

The Chairperson or a Member may resign by writing to the President (s. 5(1)). Under section 5(2) they may be removed only by order of the President on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity, after the Supreme Court, on a reference by the President, has inquired and reported that the person ought to be removed. Under section 5(3) the President may remove a Chairperson or Member who is adjudged insolvent, engages in paid employment outside the duties of office, is unfit by reason of infirmity of mind or body, is of unsound mind and so declared by a competent court, or is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for an offence involving moral turpitude in the President’s opinion. The procedure through the Supreme Court is a guarantee of independence modelled on that for judges.

7. Term and conditions: sections 6 to 8

The 2019 change to term is open to criticism. A shorter term with eligibility for re-appointment means that a Chairperson or Member who wants a second term depends on the goodwill of the government that the Commission is supposed to scrutinise.

8. Staff: section 11

The Central Government makes available an officer of the rank of Secretary to the Government of India as Secretary-General, and police and investigative staff under an officer not below the rank of Director General of Police (s. 11(1)). The Commission may appoint other administrative, technical and scientific staff under rules (s. 11(2)). The investigative wing therefore consists of police officers on deputation, a recurring criticism when the complaint is against the police.

9. Summary of the 2019 amendments

How this is examined

June 2025 and February 2025: “Discuss the constitution, powers and functions of the NHRC” (10 marks); June 2025 alternative and August 2024: “Explain the important provisions of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993”. For the constitution part, sections 4 to 7 of this note are what is wanted, stated with section numbers and the 2019 changes. Combine with the next note for powers and functions. For “important provisions”, walk through the scheme in section 2 and give a few lines on each chapter, using both notes and the note on State Commissions and Human Rights Courts.

Now try the real questions: Human Rights Law and Practice past question papers.