KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Promoters: position, duties and liabilities

Company Law · Unit I · Topic 4 of 22 · 7 min read

Who is a promoter under section 2(69), the fiduciary position from Erlanger and Gluckstein, secret profits and disclosure, pre-incorporation contracts and preliminary expenses, statutory liability for the prospectus and for fraudulent incorporation, with the unpaid registration expenses problem worked out.

On this page
  1. 1. Who is a promoter
  2. 2. Functions
  3. 3. Fiduciary position and duties
  4. 4. Statutory liability
  5. 5. Pre-incorporation contracts
  6. 6. Preliminary expenses and remuneration
  7. 7. Problem
  8. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. A promoter brings the company into being but is neither its agent nor its trustee in the strict sense, because the company does not yet exist. Equity still treats him as standing in a fiduciary position towards the company he is forming. Two consequences are examined: he must not make a secret profit, and the company is not bound by contracts he made, or expenses he incurred, before it was incorporated.

1. Who is a promoter

The classic description is Bowen J.'s in Whaley Bridge Calico Printing Co. v. Green (1880): “promoter” is a term not of law but of business, summing up in a single word a number of business operations by which a company is generally brought into existence. Cockburn C.J. in Twycross v. Grant (1877) described a promoter as one who undertakes to form a company with reference to a given project and to set it going, and who takes the necessary steps to accomplish that purpose.

The 2013 Act now gives a statutory definition. Under section 2(69) a promoter is a person (a) who has been named as such in a prospectus or identified by the company in its annual return; or (b) who has control over the affairs of the company, directly or indirectly, whether as a shareholder, director or otherwise; or (c) in accordance with whose advice, directions or instructions the Board is accustomed to act. A person acting merely in a professional capacity is excluded from clause (c), so the solicitor, accountant or valuer who does professional work in the formation is not a promoter.

2. Functions

3. Fiduciary position and duties

The leading case is Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate Co. (House of Lords, 1878). A syndicate bought a lease of a phosphate island for 55,000 pounds and, through a company it promoted and whose board it nominated, sold it to the company for 110,000 pounds without disclosing the profit to an independent board or to the members. The sale was rescinded. Lord Cairns said that promoters stand in a fiduciary position: they have in their hands the creation and moulding of the company, and must make full disclosure of any interest.

The duties that follow:

Remedies of the company. If the duty is broken the company may rescind the contract (if restitution is still possible), or recover the secret profit, or claim damages for breach of fiduciary duty.

4. Statutory liability

5. Pre-incorporation contracts

A company cannot contract before it exists, and after incorporation it cannot ratify a contract made on its behalf before incorporation, because ratification requires a principal in existence when the contract was made: Kelner v. Baxter (1866), where promoters who bought wine for an intended hotel company were held personally liable on the contract. In India the position is modified by the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Section 15(h) allows the company to obtain specific performance of a contract made by its promoters before incorporation for the purposes of the company, if the contract is warranted by the terms of incorporation and the company has accepted it and communicated the acceptance. Section 19(e) allows the other party to enforce such a contract against the company on the same conditions. Otherwise the promoter remains personally liable, and the company must make a fresh contract (novation) if it wants to be bound.

6. Preliminary expenses and remuneration

A promoter has no right to recover from the company the expenses of promotion, or any remuneration for his services, because there was no company to contract with when he incurred them: Re English and Colonial Produce Co. (1906), where a solicitor who prepared the documents and paid the registration fees at the request of the promoters could not recover from the company. In practice the articles authorise the directors to pay the preliminary expenses, and the company usually does. But a provision in the articles is not a contract with the promoter (see Eley v. Positive Government Security Life Assurance, under the articles), so he cannot sue on it.

7. Problem

‘A’, on the instructions of certain gentlemen, prepared the necessary documents and obtained the registration of a company. He paid the registration fee and incidental expenses. The company now refuses to pay him. A wants to sue the company. Advise A.

Issue. Whether a company is liable for expenses incurred on its behalf before incorporation.

Law. Before incorporation the company had no existence and could not contract or authorise anyone; it cannot later ratify a pre-incorporation contract (Kelner v. Baxter). The person who incurs preliminary expenses at the request of promoters cannot recover them from the company (Re English and Colonial Produce Co.). Sections 15(h) and 19(e) of the Specific Relief Act apply only to contracts for the purposes of the company, warranted by its incorporation and accepted by it after incorporation. A clause in the articles authorising payment of preliminary expenses gives an outsider no right to sue (Eley).

Application. A acted on the instructions of the gentlemen who were promoting the company. His contract was with them, not with a company that did not yet exist. The company has not adopted the arrangement after incorporation; it has refused to pay. Nothing suggests a fresh contract after incorporation.

Conclusion. A cannot sue the company. His remedy is against the promoters who instructed him, who are personally liable. He would have a claim against the company only if it entered into a new contract with him after incorporation, or accepted the arrangement in the manner the Specific Relief Act contemplates.

How this is examined

A short note on “Promoter” appeared in both January 2026 and June 2025; June 2025 also set the registration expenses problem above (in Unit II). For the note: definition in section 2(69) with the professional exclusion, the fiduciary position from Erlanger and Gluckstein, statutory liability under sections 34, 35 and 7(6), and two lines on pre-incorporation contracts. For a 10-mark essay on the duties and liabilities of promoters, expand each of those and add the remedies of the company.

Now try the real questions: Company Law past question papers.