Obedience to law: a legal duty, its need and importance, and why people obey
Political Science - State and Political Obligations · Unit V · Topic 13 of 16 · 4 min read
On this page
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.
Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.
1. Obedience as a legal duty
Obedience to law means conforming one’s conduct to the rules made or recognised by the State. It is a legal duty because the law itself requires it and attaches a sanction to breach: punishment for crimes, damages for civil wrongs, invalidity for transactions that ignore legal forms. Ignorance of law is no excuse (ignorantia juris non excusat): the duty binds whether or not a person knows the law.
Obedience is also, for most theories, a moral obligation: the subject of Units I and III. The legal duty answers “must I obey?”; the moral obligation answers “ought I to obey?”. For the great majority of laws the two coincide.
In India the duty is reinforced by Article 51A(a): it is the duty of every citizen to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions.
2. Need for and importance of obedience
- Order and security. Without general obedience, the State would collapse into what Hobbes called the state of nature, where life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Leviathan, 1651).
- Protection of rights. Rights exist only if others obey the laws that protect them. My right to property depends on your obedience to the law of theft.
- Liberty. Locke: “where there is no law, there is no freedom”. Law restrains each so that all may be free.
- Equality. Law applied to all and obeyed by all prevents the strong from exploiting the weak.
- Predictability. Commerce, contracts and planning depend on people acting according to known rules.
- Economy of force. If most people obey voluntarily, the State needs only a small police force for the few who do not. No State can coerce a whole population.
- Democracy. Democratic law is made by the people’s representatives; obedience is respect for the people’s own decision, and change should come through the ballot.
- Progress and welfare. Social reform laws (abolition of untouchability, child marriage restraint, labour laws) work only if obeyed.
3. Why do people normally obey? Bryce’s five reasons
James Bryce (Studies in History and Jurisprudence, 1901) identified five motives for obedience, in what he regarded as the order of their importance:
- Indolence. Obedience is the line of least resistance. Most people follow the law out of habit and mental laziness; questioning it requires effort. Bryce thought this the most common reason.
- Deference. Respect for those in authority, for age, rank, learning or office. People obey because they look up to the lawgiver or the institution.
- Sympathy. People obey because those around them obey: the desire to conform, to act with family, friends and community.
- Fear. Fear of punishment, of loss of property, liberty or reputation. Bryce placed it fourth: important for a minority, but not the main reason for most.
- Reason. The rational recognition that obedience is necessary for order and for one’s own good and the good of society. Bryce thought this motive the most valuable but, in practice, the rarest.
4. Other reasons given by modern writers
- Legitimacy. People obey because they believe the government has the right to rule (Weber; see Unit IV).
- Consent and participation. In a democracy, people obey laws they had a say in making.
- Self-interest and utility. Obedience brings security and benefits that outweigh the costs (Bentham).
- Moral conviction. Many laws enforce what people already think right (do not kill, do not steal).
- Religious belief. Religion often teaches obedience to rulers.
- Political socialisation. Family, school and media teach respect for law from childhood.
- Gratitude and fair play. Having received benefits of an ordered society, one ought to bear its burdens (Socrates in the Crito; Hart and Rawls).
5. Limits of the duty
The duty to obey is strong but not unlimited. Every theory except the most absolutist admits some exception:
- Locke: when government violates natural rights it dissolves itself, and people may resist.
- Green: resistance may be a duty when the State clearly fails the common good.
- Laski: the State’s claim to obedience depends on what it does for its members; a person must judge each law by his conscience.
- Gandhi and Thoreau: unjust laws may be disobeyed openly and non-violently (topic 3).
How this is examined
February 2025 Q.5(a): “What is meant by obedience to law? Explain the importance of obedience to law”; August 2024 Q.5(a): “Discuss the need and importance of obedience to law”; October 2023 Q.5(a): “Is it necessary to obey the law? What are the reasons behind obedience to law by the people?”; January 2026 (100 marks) Q.8(c): short note on “Need of obedience of law”. Structure: meaning, legal and moral duty, need (numbered), Bryce’s five reasons, and one paragraph on limits leading into civil disobedience.
Now try the real questions: Political Science - State and Political Obligations past question papers.