KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

The executive: meaning, types, functions; parliamentary, presidential and plural executives

Political Science - Organisation and Institution · Unit II · Topic 6 of 16 · 7 min read

The executive in its broad and narrow senses, its kinds and functions, parliamentary and presidential executives compared, and the plural executive in Switzerland and the former USSR.

On this page
  1. 1. Meaning: broad and narrow
  2. 2. Types of executive
  3. 3. Functions
  4. 4. Parliamentary executive
  5. 5. Presidential executive
  6. 6. Plural executive: a special mention
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. Meaning (broad and narrow), types, functions, and the comparison of parliamentary and presidential executives. All four are set: “Explain the powers and functions of the executive” (January 2026, 16 marks), “the parliamentary and presidential executives with examples” (January 2026, 10 marks), “types and functions of the executive” (June 2025) and “functions of the parliamentary executive” (June 2025). The Swiss plural executive is the syllabus's special mention. For the Indian institutions, see the President of India and the Council of Ministers.

1. Meaning: broad and narrow

In the broad sense the executive includes every official who carries out the law: the head of state, ministers, the civil service, the police and the armed forces. Garner: “the aggregate or totality of all the functionaries and agencies which are concerned with the execution of the will of the state as that will has been formulated and expressed in terms of law.” In the narrow sense it means only the political executive: the head of state and the ministers who decide policy and direct the administration, as distinct from the permanent civil service which executes it. When writers speak of “the executive” in a comparative sense, they usually mean the narrow one.

2. Types of executive

  1. Nominal and real. The nominal (titular) executive holds power in law but exercises it on advice: the British monarch, the Indian President. The real executive actually exercises it: the Prime Minister and Cabinet. In the USA the two coincide in the President.
  2. Hereditary and elected. The British, Japanese and Scandinavian monarchs are hereditary; presidents are elected, directly (USA, through an electoral college in form; France) or indirectly (India; Germany).
  3. Single and plural. A single executive vests final authority in one person (US President, British Prime Minister in practice). A plural executive vests it in a body of equals (the Swiss Federal Council).
  4. Parliamentary and presidential, according to the executive's relation with the legislature.
  5. Political and permanent: ministers and civil servants.

3. Functions

4. Parliamentary executive

A parliamentary (cabinet, responsible) executive is one in which the real executive is drawn from and responsible to the legislature, and holds office as long as it keeps the confidence of the lower House. Britain is the model; India, Canada, Australia and Japan follow it.

Merits: harmony between legislature and executive; responsibility, since the government can be removed at any time; flexibility in a crisis (Churchill replaced Chamberlain in 1940 without an election); an educated public through debate. Demerits: instability under coalitions or fragmented parties (the French Fourth Republic, 1946–58); cabinet dictatorship when a party has a large majority; weak separation of powers; ministers chosen for party loyalty, not ability.

5. Presidential executive

A presidential (non-parliamentary, fixed) executive is independent of the legislature in origin and tenure. The USA is the model.

Merits: stability and fixed tenure; strong leadership in emergencies; separation of powers protects liberty; ministers chosen for expertise. Demerits: deadlock between President and Congress, especially when different parties control them; rigidity (an unpopular President cannot be removed); irresponsibility between elections; concentration of power in one person.

PointParliamentaryPresidential
Head of state and governmentDifferent personsSame person
Ministers in legislatureYesNo
TenureWhile it keeps confidenceFixed term
RemovalNo-confidence voteImpeachment only
Dissolution of lower HouseYesNo
ExamplesUK, India, JapanUSA, Brazil, Mexico

France since 1958 has a semi-presidential mix: a directly elected President with real powers, and a Prime Minister and government responsible to the National Assembly.

6. Plural executive: a special mention

Switzerland: the Federal Council

The Swiss system works because of a small, prosperous, consensual society, strong cantons, and direct democracy through referendum and initiative, which lets the people overrule both Assembly and Council. Its merits are continuity, consensus and the absence of personal rule; its demerits are slow decision-making and lack of clear responsibility. Because it rests on these particular conditions, it is generally thought unsuited to copying by large or divided societies.

The former USSR

Under the Soviet constitutions of 1936 and 1977 the formal executive was collective. The Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, elected by the Supreme Soviet, acted as a collective head of state, issuing decrees between sessions; its chairman performed ceremonial functions. The Council of Ministers, also chosen by the Supreme Soviet, was the government. In practice real power lay with the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, its Politburo and its General Secretary, so the plural form concealed one-party and often one-person rule. In 1990 the office of President of the USSR was created, held by Mikhail Gorbachev until the Union was dissolved in December 1991.

Swiss and Soviet plural executives differ in kind. The Swiss Council is a genuine collegial executive in a competitive democracy. The Soviet Presidium was plural in form only, the decisions being made by the party. Say so; it earns the analysis marks.

How this is examined

For “powers and functions of the executive” give the meaning, the kinds briefly, and the functions under the headings above with Indian and American examples. For “parliamentary and presidential executives” give the features, merits and demerits of each and the comparison table. A question on the plural executive needs the Swiss Federal Council in detail and a paragraph on the USSR.

Now try the real questions: Political Science - Organisation and Institution past question papers.