KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Pledge

Contract II · Unit II · Topic 5 of 18 · 7 min read

Pledge as a bailment by way of security, how it differs from ordinary bailment, who can pledge goods they do not own, and the rights and duties of pawnor and pawnee under sections 172 to 181.

On this page
  1. 1. Definition: section 172
  2. 2. Pledge and bailment compared
  3. 3. Who can pledge
  4. 4. Rights of the pawnee
  5. 5. Duties of the pawnee
  6. 6. Rights and duties of the pawnor
  7. 7. Problem
  8. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

A pledge is a bailment with one purpose: security. Everything in sections 148 to 171 applies to it, and sections 172 to 179 add the rules peculiar to security: the pawnee's right to hold the goods for the debt, his right to sell on default after notice, the pawnor's right to redeem, and the cases in which a person who is not the owner can still make a good pledge.

1. Definition: section 172

The bailment of goods as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise is called a pledge. The bailor is the pawnor and the bailee is the pawnee. The essentials are therefore those of bailment (delivery of possession of movable goods under a contract) plus the security purpose. Delivery may be constructive: handing over the key of a godown, or a document of title such as a railway receipt or bill of lading.

In Morvi Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. Union of India, 1965 INSC 55, AIR 1965 SC 1954, the Supreme Court held that a railway receipt is a document of title to goods and that its pledge operates as a pledge of the goods themselves. The pledgee bank could therefore sue the railway for the full value of the goods lost, rather than only the amount of its advance, holding any surplus for the pawnor.

2. Pledge and bailment compared

Pledge must also be kept apart from hypothecation, where the borrower keeps possession and the lender has only a charge, and from mortgage, which transfers an interest in property (usually immovable). Without delivery of possession there is no pledge.

3. Who can pledge

The general rule is that only the owner, or a person authorised by him, can pledge: no one can give a better title than he has. The Act makes exceptions to protect a pawnee who takes in good faith.

4. Rights of the pawnee

5. Duties of the pawnee

The duty to return lies under the right to sue for the debt. In Lallan Prasad v. Rahmat Ali, 1966 INSC 261, AIR 1967 SC 1322, the pawnee sued to recover a loan advanced against a pledge of goods, but had meanwhile disposed of the goods and was not in a position to return them. The Supreme Court held that when a pawnee sues on the debt under section 176 while retaining the goods as collateral security, he must be able to return the goods on payment. Having disabled himself from doing so, he could not recover the debt; his remedy of sale is available only after reasonable notice to the pawnor.

6. Rights and duties of the pawnor

Trap. Section 176 gives the pawnee a right to sell, not to keep the goods as his own in satisfaction of the debt. If he appropriates them, or sells them without reasonable notice, he commits a wrong against the pawnor; the pawnor may treat the debt as satisfied to the extent of the value of the goods and claim the rest.

7. Problem

P pledges gold ornaments with a moneylender M for a loan of Rs 1 lakh repayable in six months. P fails to repay. Without telling P, M sells the ornaments for Rs 1.4 lakh and keeps the whole amount. P then offers to repay the loan and demands the ornaments.

Issue. Whether M's sale was valid, and what P can recover.

Law. Section 176 allows sale on default only after reasonable notice and requires the surplus to be paid to the pawnor. Section 177 allows redemption until actual sale. Lallan Prasad requires the pawnee who claims the debt to be able to return the goods.

Application. The sale without notice was wrongful, and it cut off P's right to redeem under section 177. M cannot both keep the price and recover the loan. At the least he must account for the surplus of Rs 40,000; P may also claim damages if the market value of the ornaments exceeded the price obtained.

Conclusion. P is entitled to the surplus and to damages for the wrongful sale, with the loan set off against the value of the ornaments. M cannot sue for the loan as if the pledge still subsisted.

How this is examined

January 2026 asked “Define pledge. Who can pledge?” and “Discuss the rights and duties of a pawnee.” For the first, give section 172, the comparison with bailment, and the exceptions in sections 178, 178A, 179 and the Sale of Goods Act. For the second, sections 173 to 176 for rights, the duty of notice and return for duties, and Lallan Prasad. A short note on “pledge by non-owners” is also common.

Now try the real questions: Contract II past question papers.