KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

The International Court of Justice, ECOSOC, the Trusteeship Council and the Secretariat

Public International Law · Unit V · Topic 20 of 22 · 8 min read

Composition, election and jurisdiction of the ICJ (contentious jurisdiction by special agreement, compromissory clause, optional clause and forum prorogatum; advisory jurisdiction; provisional measures and enforcement), and the composition and functions of ECOSOC, the Trusteeship Council and the Secretariat.

On this page
  1. 1. The International Court of Justice: status
  2. 2. Composition
  3. 3. Contentious jurisdiction
  4. 4. Advisory jurisdiction
  5. 5. The Economic and Social Council
  6. 6. The Trusteeship Council
  7. 7. The Secretariat
  8. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “Explain the composition and jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice” (August 2024 essay; February 2025 short note). The jurisdiction part carries most of the marks: Article 36 of the Statute in its four forms, then Article 65 on advisory opinions. The other three organs are usually short notes.

1. The International Court of Justice: status

The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the UN (Charter, Article 92). It functions under its Statute, which is annexed to and forms an integral part of the Charter. It succeeded the Permanent Court of International Justice (1922–1946), set up under Article 14 of the League Covenant. It sits at the Peace Palace in The Hague. All UN Members are ipso facto parties to the Statute (Article 93(1)); a non-member may become a party on conditions set by the General Assembly on the Security Council's recommendation (Article 93(2)), as Switzerland did before joining the UN.

2. Composition

Indian judges who have served: Sir Benegal Narsing Rau (1952–1953), Nagendra Singh (1973–1988, President 1985–1988), R.S. Pathak (1989–1991) and Dalveer Bhandari (from 2012, re-elected in 2017).

3. Contentious jurisdiction

Only States may be parties in cases before the Court (Article 34(1)). Jurisdiction rests on consent, which may be given in four ways.

Compétence de la compétence: in the event of a dispute as to whether the Court has jurisdiction, the matter is settled by the decision of the Court (Article 36(6)).

Applicable law: Article 38 (see the note on sources).

Provisional measures (Article 41): binding, as held in LaGrand (Germany v. USA), 2001. India obtained provisional measures staying Jadhav's execution in May 2017.

Effect of judgments. Binding only between the parties and in respect of that case (Article 59); final and without appeal (Article 60); revision only on discovery of a decisive new fact within ten years (Article 61). Each Member undertakes to comply with the Court's decision in any case to which it is a party; if a party fails, the other may have recourse to the Security Council, which may make recommendations or decide on measures (Charter, Article 94).

4. Advisory jurisdiction

The General Assembly or the Security Council may request an advisory opinion on any legal question; other organs and specialised agencies authorised by the Assembly may request opinions on legal questions arising within the scope of their activities (Charter, Article 96). The Court may give an advisory opinion on any legal question at the request of whatever body may be so authorised (Statute, Article 65(1)). States cannot request opinions.

Opinions are not binding, unless an instrument provides otherwise, but they carry great authority. The Court has discretion to decline but has said it should refuse only for compelling reasons. Major opinions: Reparation for Injuries (1949); Reservations to the Genocide Convention (1951); Certain Expenses (1962); Namibia (1971); Western Sahara (1975); Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (1996); the Wall (2004); Kosovo (2010), holding that the declaration of independence did not violate international law; Chagos (2019); and Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change (2025).

5. The Economic and Social Council

6. The Trusteeship Council

Chapters XII and XIII established the international trusteeship system for territories held under League mandates, territories detached from enemy States in the Second World War, and territories voluntarily placed under it (Article 77). Its basic objectives included the progressive development of the inhabitants towards self-government or independence (Article 76). The Council consisted of the members administering trust territories, the permanent members of the Security Council not administering any, and enough elected members to balance the two (Article 86). It considered reports, accepted petitions and made periodic visits (Article 87). With the independence of Palau, the last trust territory, the Council suspended operation on 1 November 1994; it now meets only as and when required.

7. The Secretariat

How this is examined

For the ICJ essay: status (Articles 92 and 93), composition with the election procedure and term, then contentious jurisdiction under (a) to (d), Article 36(6), provisional measures, effect of judgments and Article 94, and advisory jurisdiction with a list of opinions. A six-mark note on the ICJ compresses the same into composition, the two jurisdictions, and Article 94. Notes on ECOSOC and the Secretariat should give the composition Article and the functions Articles listed above.

Now try the real questions: Public International Law past question papers.