KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Hours of work, annual leave and employment of women and young persons under the OSH Code

Labour and Industrial Law II · Unit IV · Topic 13 of 18 · 9 min read

Daily hours, weekly and compensatory holidays, overtime at twice the rate, night shifts and annual leave with wages under Chapter VII of the OSH Code 2020; women's right to work at night with consent under Chapter X; and how adolescents and children are dealt with through the Child and Adolescent Labour Act, 1986, with the Somu factory problem solved.

On this page
  1. 1. Daily hours (section 25)
  2. 2. Weekly holidays, overtime and shifts
  3. 3. Annual leave with wages (section 32)
  4. 4. Employment of women (Chapter X)
  5. 5. Adolescents and children
  6. 6. Problem
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The shape of Chapter VII. Sections 25 to 32 of the OSH Code replace Chapters VI and VIII of the Factories Act, 1948 and the hours provisions of the Mines, Motor Transport, Plantations and Working Journalists Acts. The Code fixes the outer limits itself (eight hours a day, six days a week, overtime at twice the rate, one day’s leave for every twenty days) and leaves intervals and spread-over to notification. Young persons are sent to a different Act altogether.

1. Daily hours (section 25)

No worker shall be required or allowed to work in any establishment for more than eight hours in a day (section 25(1)(a)) [Factories Act, s. 54: nine hours]. The period of work each day must be fixed so as not to exceed the hours, intervals and spread-over notified by the appropriate Government (section 25(1)(b)) [ss. 55 and 56: rest after five hours, spread-over 10½ hours]. Special rules apply:

2. Weekly holidays, overtime and shifts

3. Annual leave with wages (section 32)

Section 32(1) [Factories Act, ss. 79 and 80] entitles every worker to leave with wages in a calendar year on these terms:

4. Employment of women (Chapter X)

Section 43 provides that women are entitled to be employed in all establishments for all types of work, and may be employed, with their consent, before 6 a.m. and beyond 7 p.m., subject to conditions on safety, holidays and working hours prescribed by the appropriate Government. This reverses section 66(1)(b) of the Factories Act, which barred women from factory work outside 6 a.m. to 7 p.m., and the old bars on women cleaning moving machinery or working near cotton openers.

Section 44 allows the Government, where an operation is dangerous to women’s health and safety, to require adequate safeguards before women are employed in it. The approach is protection by safeguards, not exclusion. Section 82(b) still allows rules prohibiting or restricting the employment of pregnant women in dangerous operations in factories, and section 93(2) allows special safeguards for women and adolescents handling chemicals in plantations.

The constitutional reasoning is that of Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India, 2007 INSC 1242, (2008) 3 SCC 1. The Court struck down section 30 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, which barred women from employment in premises where liquor was served. Protective legislation that rests on stereotypes and restricts a woman’s choice of work fails Articles 14, 15 and 21; the State’s duty is to secure her safety, not to keep her out.

5. Adolescents and children

The Code defines an adolescent by reference to the 1986 Act (14 to 18 years) and an adult as a person who has completed eighteen. It does not regulate children at all: that is done by the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, as amended in 2016, which the Labour Codes did not repeal.

In M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1996 INSC 1454, (1996) 6 SCC 756 (the Sivakasi match factories case), the Court directed every employer of a child in contravention of the law to pay Rs 20,000 per child into a welfare fund, and the 2016 amendment now provides a Child and Adolescent Labour Rehabilitation Fund (s. 14B).

6. Problem

Somu, aged 13, works in a factory. He is made to work more than six hours without any interval, between 8 p.m. and 6 a.m., and is given no weekly holiday. Examine the liability of the employer. (February 2025)

Issue. Whether the employer is liable for employing a 13-year-old at all, and separately for the hours, night work and denial of a weekly holiday.

Law. Article 24 bars employment of a child below fourteen in any factory. Section 3 of the Child and Adolescent Labour Act, 1986 prohibits employment of a child in any occupation or process, and section 14(1) punishes it with six months to two years’ imprisonment or fine of Rs 20,000 to Rs 50,000 or both. The OSH Code fixes eight hours a day (section 25), six days a week (section 26) and sends the hours of adolescents to the 1986 Act (section 25(4)); section 7 of that Act bars work between 7 p.m. and 8 a.m. and requires an hour of rest after three hours.

Application. Somu is a child, not an adolescent. Neither exception in section 3(2) applies: a factory is not a family enterprise and he is not an artist. His employment is therefore unlawful from the first day, whatever the hours; there is no lawful pattern of hours on which a 13-year-old may work in a factory. The hours make the case worse. Even an adolescent could not be made to work more than three hours without an hour’s rest, could not work at night between 7 p.m. and 8 a.m., and is entitled to a weekly holiday. Even an adult worker could not be kept for over eight hours in the day without the notified intervals, or denied the weekly holiday under section 26. If the employer claims Somu is older, section 117 of the Code puts the burden on him to prove it, by Aadhaar, school certificate or birth certificate before any ossification test.

Conclusion. The occupier is liable to prosecution under section 14(1) of the 1986 Act for employing a child, and to penalty under the OSH Code for the breach of the hours and holiday provisions (section 94, Rs 2 lakh to Rs 3 lakh). Under M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu he must also pay Rs 20,000 for the child’s rehabilitation. Somu must be withdrawn from work and rehabilitated, with his schooling secured under Article 21A.

Trap. Do not answer a problem on a 13-year-old by applying the adolescent hour limits as if they made the job lawful. Below fourteen the answer is total prohibition. The hour limits matter only for a worker aged 14 to 18 in non-hazardous work.

How this is examined

The Somu problem (February 2025) is the model; the August 2024 and January 2026 papers asked for the prohibitions and regulations under the Child Labour Act and its 2016 amendment, which are answered from section 5 above. Under the new syllabus expect “Explain the provisions on hours of work and annual leave with wages under the OSH Code” (give old and new numbers side by side: nine to eight hours, 240 to 180 days) and a short note on employment of women at night under section 43.

Now try the real questions: Labour and Industrial Law II past question papers.