Human rights: meaning, nature and kinds - Human Rights Law and Practice

← All Human Rights Law and Practice topics Past papers

On this page

1. Meaning and definition
2. Nature and characteristics
3. Kinds of human rights
4. Human rights distinguished from related ideas
How this is examined

Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. Unit I is jurisprudence, and the questions are short and general: define human rights, explain their nature, list their kinds. The marks go to an answer that gives a working definition, quotes the Indian statutory definition accurately, and then sorts the characteristics and kinds under clear headings instead of a loose paragraph.

1. Meaning and definition

Human rights are the rights a person has simply because he or she is a human being. They do not depend on citizenship, sex, race, religion, caste or any grant by the State. The State does not create them; it recognises and protects them. The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights describes them as rights inherent to all human beings, whatever their nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, language or any other status.

Three definitions are worth having ready.

The UDHR, Article 1. “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” Dignity is the root idea; every specific right is a way of protecting it.
Laski. Rights are “those conditions of social life without which no man can seek, in general, to be himself at his best” (A Grammar of Politics, 1925). This explains why economic and social conditions belong in the list as well as freedoms.
The Indian statute. Section 2(1)(d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 defines human rights as “the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and enforceable by courts in India.” Section 2(1)(f) defines the International Covenants as the ICCPR and the ICESCR adopted by the General Assembly on 16 December 1966, and such other covenant or convention as the Central Government may notify.

Read section 2(1)(d) closely. It is narrower than the moral idea. A right counts for the purposes of the Act only if it relates to life, liberty, equality or dignity, is found in the Constitution or the Covenants, and is enforceable by Indian courts. A right in a Covenant that no Indian court will enforce falls outside it. Saying so shows the examiner you have read the definition rather than paraphrased it.

2. Nature and characteristics

Universal. They belong to every human being everywhere. The Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, 1993, paragraph 5, states that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated.
Inherent. They are not conferred by the State and cannot be withdrawn by it at will. This is why the Supreme Court has said that the right to life under Article 21 existed before the Constitution and the Constitution only recognised it.
Inalienable. A person cannot surrender them, sell them or contract out of them. A bonded labour agreement is void however freely it was signed.
Indivisible and interdependent. Civil and political rights cannot be enjoyed in full without economic and social rights, and the reverse. The right to vote means little to a person without food or literacy.
Equal and non-discriminatory. Every instrument contains a non-discrimination clause: UDHR Article 2, ICCPR Article 2(1) and 26, ICESCR Article 2(2).
Not absolute. Most rights may be restricted by law for public order, health, morals, national security or the rights of others (UDHR Article 29(2)). A small core cannot be restricted even in an emergency (ICCPR Article 4(2)).
Correlated with duties. Rights impose duties on the State to respect (not interfere), protect (prevent others from interfering) and fulfil (take positive steps). UDHR Article 29(1) also speaks of the individual’s duties to the community.
Dynamic. The list grows: environment, development, privacy in the digital age, rights of persons with disabilities and of older persons were not in the 1948 text.

3. Kinds of human rights

There is no single official classification. Give three or four ways of sorting them and say what each is useful for.

(a) By generation. The scheme associated with Karel Vasak (1977) follows the three ideals of the French Revolution.

First generation: civil and political rights (liberty). Life, freedom from torture and slavery, liberty and security of person, fair trial, privacy, freedom of thought, religion, expression, assembly and association, the right to vote. Found in the ICCPR. Traditionally they call on the State to refrain from acting.
Second generation: economic, social and cultural rights (equality). Work, just conditions of work, trade unions, social security, an adequate standard of living, health, education and cultural life. Found in the ICESCR. They call on the State to act and to spend, and are realised progressively.
Third generation: solidarity or group rights (fraternity). The right to development (UN Declaration on the Right to Development, 1986), to peace, to a healthy environment, to self-determination and to the common heritage of mankind. The African Charter of 1981 was the first treaty to give these rights binding form.

The generations are a teaching device, not a ranking. The Vienna Declaration rejects any hierarchy, and the Supreme Court of India has read many second-generation rights (livelihood, shelter, health, education) into Article 21, a first-generation right.

(b) By holder. Individual rights belong to each person (fair trial, expression). Collective rights belong to a group or a people (self-determination, minority rights under ICCPR Article 27, the rights of indigenous peoples).

(c) By derogability. Derogable rights may be suspended in a public emergency that threatens the life of the nation, to the extent strictly required. Non-derogable rights may not: under ICCPR Article 4(2) these are Articles 6 (life), 7 (torture), 8(1) and (2) (slavery and servitude), 11 (imprisonment for inability to fulfil a contract), 15 (retroactive criminal law), 16 (recognition as a person before the law) and 18 (thought, conscience and religion). India’s counterpart is Article 359 as amended in 1978: Articles 20 and 21 cannot be suspended during an emergency.

(d) By source. Natural or moral rights claimed on the basis of human nature; legal rights recognised by statute or treaty; constitutional or fundamental rights placed beyond ordinary legislative change, as in Part III of the Indian Constitution.

(e) By enforceability in India. Fundamental rights in Part III are justiciable under Articles 32 and 226. Directive Principles in Part IV are not, though Article 37 calls them fundamental in governance. The Constitutional Law notes on Part III and the DPSPs cover this division in detail; for this paper it is enough to say that Part III corresponds broadly to the ICCPR and Part IV to the ICESCR.

4. Human rights distinguished from related ideas

Fundamental rights are the subset of human rights that a particular constitution has written down and made enforceable. Some fundamental rights in India (Article 19, Articles 29 and 30 in part) are confined to citizens; human rights are not.
Civil rights in the narrow sense are rights conferred by the law of a State on its members; they may be given and taken away by that law.
Humanitarian law (the Geneva Conventions of 1949) protects persons in armed conflict; human rights law applies in peace and war alike.

How this is examined

Mostly as 6-mark short notes. June 2025 set “Write a note on nature of human rights”; January 2026 set “Kinds of human rights”. The nature question wants section 2 above with a sentence of explanation for each characteristic. The kinds question wants the three generations first, then at least two other classifications, ending with the point that the Vienna Declaration treats all rights as indivisible.

In any Unit I answer, quote section 2(1)(d) of the 1993 Act verbatim. It ties the theory to Indian law and is a phrase the examiner will be looking for.