KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Seeds, Propagating Material and the Seeds Act 1966: Background and Basic Concepts

Law of Intellectual Property and Plant Varieties · Unit I · Topic 1 of 12 · 7 min read

The road from farm-saved seed and public breeding to the PPV&FR Act, the statutory meaning of seed, propagating material, variety, breeder and farmer, the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act 1966, and how seed quality law and plant variety protection fit together.

On this page
  1. 1. Historical background
  2. 2. Seed, plant and propagating material
  3. 3. The Seeds Act, 1966: relevant provisions
  4. 4. How the two Acts connect
  5. 5. Basic concepts of the PPV FR Act
  6. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

About this paper. KSLU sets this as Paper VI of the LL.M. (IPR Law). These notes follow the units of KSLU’s two-year LL.M. syllabus (2022–23) for the paper and the past papers: I, history, seeds and the Seeds Act, basic concepts and PBRs against patents; II, the PPV&FR Act and the kinds of variety; III, registration, opposition, rights, term, benefit sharing, surrender and revocation; IV, transfer, licences, remedies, offences, the Authority, Registry, appellate forum and the powers of governments; V, TRIPS, UPOV and the ITPGRFA (with the CBD and Nagoya Protocol).

What Unit I asks. The KSLU syllabus opens with the “historical background leading to modern legislations; meaning of seeds, plants, propagating material and relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966”, followed by the meaning of plant variety, new variety, plant breeder, farmer, cultivator, PBRs and farmers’ rights. The PBR note covers the distinction from patents and the socio-economic debate. This note supplies the Indian background, the Seeds Act and the definitions.

1. Historical background

  1. Seed as a commons. For most of history farmers saved seed from each harvest, exchanged it with neighbours, and selected for local conditions. Landraces and farmers’ varieties are the product of that practice. No one owned a variety.
  2. Public breeding and the Green Revolution. From the 1960s high-yielding varieties of wheat and rice were bred and distributed mainly by public institutions: the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, the State agricultural universities and the National Seeds Corporation (1963). The State’s concern was seed quality, not ownership, and the Seeds Act, 1966 reflects that.
  3. Private seed industry. The Seeds (Control) Order, 1983, made under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, required seed dealers to be licensed. The New Policy on Seed Development, 1988 opened the sector to private and foreign investment and to imports of seed. Hybrids, which farmers cannot usefully save, gave private breeders a biological form of protection.
  4. TRIPS. Article 27(3)(b) required India to protect plant varieties by patents, an effective sui generis system, or both. India chose a sui generis law and, after long debate on whether to follow UPOV 1991, enacted the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001. Sections 2 to 13 came into force on 11 November 2005 and the rest on 19 October 2006.
  5. Unfinished reform. A Seeds Bill to replace the 1966 Act was introduced in 2004 and later redrafted, but has not been enacted, so the 1966 Act remains the quality law.

2. Seed, plant and propagating material

TermSeeds Act, 1966PPV&FR Act, 2001
Seeds.2(11): seed of food crops (including edible oilseeds, fruits and vegetables), cotton, cattle fodder and jute, used for sowing or planting, including seedlings, tubers, bulbs, rhizomes, roots, cuttings, grafts and other vegetatively propagated materials.2(x): a type of living embryo or propagule capable of regeneration and giving rise to a plant true to type
Propagating materialCovered within “seed”s.2(r): any plant or its component or part, including an intended seed or seed, capable of or suitable for regeneration into a plant
Varietys.2(16): a sub-division of a kind identifiable by growth, yield, plant, fruit, seed or other characteristics.2(za): plant grouping in a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank, defined, distinguishable and stable on propagation
Kinds.2(8): related species or sub-species known by one common name (cabbage, maize, paddy, wheat)Not used; the Act speaks of genera and species notified under s.29(2)

Neither Act defines “plant”; it takes its ordinary botanical meaning. The PPV&FR Act excludes micro-organisms from “variety”. The difference in definitions follows the difference in purpose. The Seeds Act lists crop groups because it regulates what is sold to farmers; the PPV&FR Act defines seed and propagating material by biological capacity to regenerate, because the breeder’s right attaches to anything that can reproduce the variety.

3. The Seeds Act, 1966: relevant provisions

Critique. The Act controls only notified kinds and varieties, and much of the market (especially private hybrids that are never notified) escapes its labelling rules. Certification is voluntary, and the penalties have not been revised since 1966, so they do not deter the sale of spurious seed, which is the most common complaint of Indian farmers. Compare section 39(2) of the PPV&FR Act, which lets farmers claim compensation from the breeder before the Authority when registered seed fails to give its disclosed performance.

4. How the two Acts connect

5. Basic concepts of the PPV&FR Act

How this is examined

A short note on the “Seeds Act, 1966” needs its purpose (quality, not ownership), sections 5, 6, 7, 9, 19 and 24, and the link to extant varieties. “Define seed, propagating material and variety” is answered with the table, contrasting the two Acts. An essay on the historical background should run from farm-saved seed through public breeding and the 1988 policy to TRIPS and the 2001 Act.

Now try the real questions: Law of Intellectual Property and Plant Varieties past question papers.