KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

PPV&FR Act: Authority, Registry, Appeals, Transfer of Rights and Powers of Governments

Law of Intellectual Property and Plant Varieties · Unit IV · Topic 9 of 12 · 7 min read

How rights in a registered variety pass by assignment, succession and authorisation, the composition and functions of the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Authority and the Plant Varieties Registry, the appellate tribunal that was never set up and the High Court appeal that replaced it, and the powers of the Central and State Governments under the Act.

On this page
  1. 1. Transfer of rights
  2. 2. The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Authority
  3. 3. The Registry and the National Register
  4. 4. The appellate forum
  5. 5. Powers of the Central Government
  6. 6. Powers and role of the State Governments
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

What the syllabus asks. Unit IV of the KSLU syllabus covers transfer of rights (assignment, transmission and licences), the remedies and offences, the “Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Right Authority and Registry, Plant Varieties Protection Appellate Tribunal” and the “powers of the Central and State Governments”. Licences, infringement and offences are in the licences note. This note covers the rest, from the Act as it now stands after the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021.

1. Transfer of rights

Unlike the Trade Marks Act or the Semiconductor Layout-Design Act, the PPV&FR Act has no chapter on assignment and transmission. The rules are spread across the Act:

The Act does not lay down a procedure for recording an outright assignment of a registered variety, so an assignee relies on the general law of contract and property for the transfer and on the Registrar for the entry. This is a gap a student can point out when asked to evaluate the Act.

2. The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority

Constitution (section 3)

Functions and powers

Section 8(1) states the general duty: to promote the development of new varieties and to protect the rights of farmers and breeders. Section 8(2) lists the measures: registration of extant varieties; characterisation and documentation of registered varieties; documentation, indexing and cataloguing of farmers’ varieties; compulsory cataloguing facilities for all plant varieties; ensuring that seed of registered varieties is available to farmers, including through compulsory licensing; collecting statistics; and maintaining the Register. Elsewhere the Act gives the Authority its main adjudicatory work: benefit-sharing claims (section 26), EDV registration (section 23), revocation (section 34), annual fees and forfeiture (section 35), farmers’ compensation for failed seed (section 39(2)), community claims (section 41) and compulsory licences (section 47).

3. The Registry and the National Register

4. The appellate forum

As enacted, the Act provided for a Plant Varieties Protection Appellate Tribunal (section 54) of judicial and technical members (section 55). Section 59 said that until the Tribunal was set up, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board would exercise its jurisdiction, with a technical member appointed under the PPV&FR Act. The Tribunal itself was never established.

The Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, with effect from 4 April 2021, omitted sections 54, 55, 58 and 59 and substituted the High Court. Under section 56 an appeal lies to the High Court, within the period prescribed by the High Court’s rules, against an order or decision of:

Under section 57 the High Court hears both parties, may amend its order within thirty days to correct a mistake apparent from the record, should where possible decide the appeal within one year, and sends a copy of its order to the Registrar. Farmers and communities pay no fees before the Authority, Registrar or High Court (section 44).

Critical point. The appellate tribunal was meant to combine legal and scientific expertise in questions such as whether a variety is essentially derived or whether a benefit-sharing claim is made out. The High Court has no technical members. The court can appoint a scientific adviser in infringement suits (section 67), but there is no equivalent provision for appeals. Supporters of the 2021 reform point to the long delay in setting up the Tribunal at all.

5. Powers of the Central Government

6. Powers and role of the State Governments

The State role under the PPV&FR Act itself is small. Critics argue that a farmer-oriented law depends on State machinery for its delivery (awareness of farmers’ rights, registration of farmers’ varieties, compensation claims), and that the Act gives the States too little part in it.

How this is examined

A short note on the “PPV&FR Authority” needs section 3 (composition), section 8 (functions) and the adjudicatory powers. On the “Appellate Tribunal”, state the original scheme, the IPAB stopgap in section 59, and the 2021 shift to the High Court with the list in section 56. For “powers of the Central and State Governments”, use the two lists. A question on assignment and transmission should be answered from section 1, pointing out the gap in the Act.

Now try the real questions: Law of Intellectual Property and Plant Varieties past question papers.