Women, gender justice and the law - Law and Social Transformation in India

← All Law and Social Transformation in India topics Past papers

On this page

1. Theories behind the law
2. The constitutional policy
3. Gender, dignity and privacy
4. Crimes against women: the statutory framework
5. Sexual exploitation and trafficking
6. The National Commission for Women
7. Comparative and international
How this is examined

Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. One of the two most-set topics in the paper. The forms: constitutional policy on gender justice (2024); adequacy of laws against crimes on women (2023); legal response to sexual exploitation of women (2021); legislative measures against gender discrimination (2019); women's empowerment and its ways (2012, 2014, 2015); gender discrimination as an invasion of dignity and privacy (2014); and the short note on the National Commission for Women. Structure every answer as constitution, statutes, courts, institutions, and an evaluation.

1. Theories behind the law

Liberal feminism asks for equal treatment and equal opportunity; radical feminism (Catharine MacKinnon's dominance approach) sees sex inequality as a structure of male power, so sameness and difference are both the wrong questions; and the Indian tradition adds intersectionality with caste, class and religion. The Constitution's answer is substantive equality: Article 15(3) permits special provisions for women and children, and Articles 14 and 15(1) forbid discrimination based on stereotypes. Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India, 2007 INSC 1242, struck down a bar on women working in premises serving liquor, holding that “protective” laws resting on stereotypes deserve close scrutiny.

2. The constitutional policy

Articles 14, 15(1), 15(3), 16(1) and (2), 21 (dignity, privacy, bodily autonomy), 23 (trafficking).
Directive principles: Article 39(a) adequate livelihood, (d) equal pay for equal work, (e) health and strength of workers, 42 maternity relief, 44 uniform civil code.
Article 51A(e): renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.
Articles 243D and 243T: one-third of seats and chairpersons' posts in panchayats and municipalities (1992).
The Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act 2023 (Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam): one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha, State Assemblies and the Delhi Assembly (Articles 330A, 332A, 239AA), taking effect after delimitation following the first census after its commencement, for fifteen years (Article 334A).

3. Gender, dignity and privacy

The 2014 question (“gender discrimination most often invades dignity of life and right to privacy”) is now answered through K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, 2017 INSC 801, which located decisional autonomy (choices on marriage, procreation, sexuality) in the privacy right. Its applications:

Joseph Shine v. Union of India, 2018 INSC 898: section 497 IPC struck down as treating the wife as chattel.
X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, 2022 INSC 1035: unmarried women may seek termination up to 24 weeks on the same terms as married women; reproductive autonomy is part of Article 21.
Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, 2020 INSC 198: permanent commission for women officers; the Army's arguments based on physiological limits rejected as stereotypes.
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, 2014 INSC 275: “sex” in Articles 15 and 16 includes gender identity; transgender persons recognised as a third gender.

4. Crimes against women: the statutory framework

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 gathers the offences in a chapter on offences against woman and child. Rape is in section 63 (punishment in section 64); section 69 newly punishes sexual intercourse obtained by deceitful means such as a false promise of marriage; dowry death is section 80; cruelty by husband or relatives is section 85. Other statutes:

Dowry Prohibition Act 1961; Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987; Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act 1994 (sex selection).
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act 1956; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act 1986.
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005: a civil remedy with protection, residence and monetary orders.
Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013, which codified the guidelines in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, 1997 INSC 604.
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013, following the Justice J.S. Verma Committee report after the December 2012 Delhi gang rape: wider definition of rape, new offences of stalking, voyeurism and acid attack. The 2018 amendment added the death penalty for rape of a girl below twelve.

Judicial additions: Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum v. Union of India, 1994 INSC 467, directed legal assistance and a compensation scheme for rape victims; Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Subhra Chakraborty, 1995 INSC 907, held rape a violation of Article 21 and allowed interim compensation; Independent Thought v. Union of India, 2017 INSC 1030, read down the marital rape exception for wives under eighteen. The general marital rape exception (now in section 63 BNS) has been challenged before the Supreme Court.

Adequacy: the evaluation an examiner wants. The statute book is now extensive; the gaps are elsewhere. (1) Enforcement: low conviction rates, delay, and police reluctance to register complaints. (2) Social sanction: dowry and sex selection persist despite clear law. (3) Doctrinal gaps: marital rape; the gender-specific framing of rape law; uncertain reach of the POSH Act in the informal sector, where Local Committees are often not constituted. (4) The “misuse” narrative, which led courts to dilute section 498A safeguards and which women's groups contest. A strong answer argues that more criminal law is not the main need; economic independence, property rights (Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, 2020 INSC 487) and institutional capacity matter more.

5. Sexual exploitation and trafficking

Article 23 prohibits traffic in human beings. The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act 1956 penalises trafficking, brothel-keeping and living on earnings of prostitution, but has been criticised for penalising the women themselves. Gaurav Jain v. Union of India, 1997 INSC 547, directed rehabilitation of women in prostitution and their children. International instruments: the UN Trafficking Protocol (Palermo, 2000), which India ratified in 2011, and the SAARC Convention on Trafficking in Women and Children (2002).

6. The National Commission for Women

Set up under the National Commission for Women Act 1990 and constituted in January 1992: a chairperson, five members and a member-secretary. Under section 10 it investigates safeguards for women under the Constitution and laws, reviews laws and suggests amendments, takes up complaints and suo motu cases of deprivation of rights, funds litigation on issues affecting women, inspects custodial institutions, and reports to the Union government. It has the powers of a civil court for summoning and evidence while investigating.

Assessment. Its recommendations are not binding, its members are political appointees, and it depends on the Ministry for funds. Proposals to make it a constitutional body like the NCSC have not been adopted. Karnataka has its own State Commission for Women under a 1995 State Act.

7. Comparative and international

CEDAW (1979), ratified by India in 1993 with declarations on non-interference in the personal affairs of communities; the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action (1995). Vishaka relied on CEDAW to fill a legislative gap.
United States: intermediate scrutiny for sex classifications from Craig v. Boren (1976); United States v. Virginia (1996) required an “exceedingly persuasive justification”. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) overruled Roe v. Wade, the reverse of the Indian direction in the X judgment.
United Kingdom: the Equality Act 2010 consolidates sex discrimination law, including indirect discrimination and the public sector equality duty.

How this is examined

Essays on constitutional policy on gender justice, empowerment of women, crimes against women and their adequacy, legislative measures against gender discrimination, sexual exploitation of women. Short notes: National Commission for Women, political empowerment of women, sexual harassment at the workplace, offences relating to miscarriage (sections 88 to 92 BNS, read with the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971 as amended in 2021). Always end with the adequacy box.