KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Revenue officers under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and their procedure

Land Law · Unit III · Topic 8 of 18 · 7 min read

The hierarchy of revenue officers in Karnataka after the 2024 amendment creating the Revenue Commissioner, the powers of each, revenue officers as revenue courts, formal and summary inquiries, hearings, eviction, and the exclusive jurisdiction of revenue courts with the bar on civil courts under sections 61 to 66.

On this page
  1. 1. The territorial frame: sections 3 to 6
  2. 2. The officers: sections 7 to 20
  3. 3. Revenue officers as revenue courts: sections 24 and 25
  4. 4. Procedure: sections 26 to 39
  5. 5. Exclusive jurisdiction of revenue courts: sections 60 to 66
  6. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. Chapter II of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (the “KLR Act”) sets up the chain of officers; Chapter III tells them how to decide; Chapter VI says what civil courts cannot touch. The chain was changed in August 2024, when Karnataka Act 38 of 2024 created a Revenue Commissioner between the Government and the Regional Commissioners. An answer that stops at the Regional Commissioner is now out of date.

1. The territorial frame: sections 3 to 6

The State Government is the chief controlling authority in all matters of land and land revenue administration (section 3). The State is divided into regions, each region into districts, each district into taluks, each taluk into circles and each circle into villages (section 4). The Government may alter, amalgamate, create, abolish or rename these units by notification, after publishing the proposal and considering objections except where it thinks this unnecessary (sections 4(4), 4(4A), 5 and 6).

2. The officers: sections 7 to 20

Section 14 provides for officers to discharge duties during temporary vacancies. Sections 22 and 23 let the Deputy Commissioner demand and recover public money, papers and property held by a revenue officer or other person.

3. Revenue officers as revenue courts: sections 24 and 25

A revenue officer not below the rank of Tahsildar, when exercising power under this or any other Act to inquire into or decide any question between the State and a person or between parties, is a Revenue Court (section 24). Section 25 saves the inherent power of a revenue court to make orders necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of its process. A proviso inserted by Karnataka Act 28 of 2025 (w.e.f. 7 April 2025) allows the inherent power to review to be exercised, suo motu or on application, within six months of the order, on discovery of new and important matter, an error apparent on the record, want of jurisdiction, misapplication of a legal provision or an analogous ground not amounting to an error on merits.

4. Procedure: sections 26 to 39

5. Exclusive jurisdiction of revenue courts: sections 60 to 66

Section 61(1): a revenue court has jurisdiction to decide any matter which it is empowered by the Act to decide, and no civil court shall exercise jurisdiction over it. Section 61(2) lists matters expressly taken from civil courts, including:

Section 62 saves three kinds of suit: against the Government to contest revenue paid under protest or recovered in excess; between private parties to establish a private right, even if affected by a land-record entry; and between private parties for possession of land. Section 63 requires a plaintiff suing the Government to exhaust his statutory appeals first. Section 64 allows the Tribunal to refer a question of law to the High Court, and section 65 allows a civil court in doubt about its jurisdiction to refer that question to the High Court.

Trap. The bar in section 61 is a bar against claims on the Government and against revenue matters. A title dispute between two private persons still goes to the civil court (section 62(b) and the proviso to section 135). Revenue entries do not decide title.

How this is examined

“Revenue officers under the KLR Act” is a short note in almost every paper (January 2026, June 2025, August 2024, November 2022): list the officers from the Secretary to the Village Accountant with one line on each, starting with the 2024 changes. “Explain the procedure to be followed by revenue officers to settle revenue disputes” (August 2024) uses sections 3 and 4 above. “Explain the exclusive jurisdiction of revenue courts” (August 2024) uses section 5.

Now try the real questions: Land Law past question papers.