KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Foreign institutional investors, NRIs and overseas corporate bodies

International Trade Economics · Unit V · Topic 22 of 24 · 6 min read

Portfolio investment by foreign institutional investors from 1992 to the SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2019 and their limits; investment by non-resident Indians and OCI cardholders on repatriation and non-repatriation basis, their bank accounts and their significance for trade; and the rise and derecognition of overseas corporate bodies in 2003.

On this page
  1. 1. Foreign institutional investors
  2. 2. From FII to FPI
  3. 3. Non-resident Indians
  4. 4. Significance of NRI investment for international trade
  5. 5. Overseas corporate bodies
  6. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “Foreign Institutional Investment” was a short note in June 2025; “Investment by overseas corporate bodies” in February 2025; “Investment by NRI in India” in August 2024; and “the significance of NRI investment in promotion of international trade” the essay in January 2026. The syllabus still says “FIIs” and “OCBs”; both terms are historical, and the answer must say what replaced them.

1. Foreign institutional investors

Portfolio investment by foreign institutions was permitted from September 1992 under Government guidelines, as part of liberalisation, and regulated by the SEBI (Foreign Institutional Investors) Regulations, 1995. FIIs were pension funds, mutual funds, insurance companies, investment trusts, university funds, endowments and asset managers registered with SEBI, investing in listed shares, debt and derivatives. Their sub-accounts invested on behalf of clients. Many invested through Mauritius to use the India–Mauritius tax treaty. In Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan, 2003 INSC 526, (2004) 10 SCC 1, the Supreme Court upheld the CBDT circular under which a Mauritian tax residence certificate was sufficient evidence of residence for the treaty, holding that treaty shopping by itself was not illegal. The treaty was amended in 2016 to tax capital gains on shares acquired from 1 April 2017 at source.

2. From FII to FPI

In 2014 the FII, sub-account and qualified foreign investor categories were merged into a single class of foreign portfolio investors under the SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2014, now replaced by the SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2019.

Significance and concerns. Portfolio flows deepen the stock market, improve liquidity and price discovery, lower the cost of capital and bring institutional discipline to corporate governance. But they are volatile: sudden outflows weaken the rupee and markets, as in 2008 and 2013. That is why policy distinguishes them from FDI and caps them.

3. Non-resident Indians

An NRI is an individual resident outside India who is a citizen of India. An Overseas Citizen of India cardholder (registered under section 7A of the Citizenship Act, 1955) is a foreign national of Indian origin; for investment purposes OCIs are generally treated on par with NRIs.

4. Significance of NRI investment for international trade

5. Overseas corporate bodies

An OCB was a company, partnership firm, society or other corporate body owned directly or indirectly to the extent of at least 60 per cent by NRIs, including overseas trusts in which at least 60 per cent of the beneficial interest was held by NRIs. To attract diaspora capital, OCBs were given the same concessions as NRIs from the 1980s, including portfolio investment and real estate.

The concessions were misused. After the stock market irregularities of 2001, the Joint Parliamentary Committee found that some OCBs were vehicles for routing domestic money and manipulating share prices. The RBI withdrew the facilities, and the Foreign Exchange Management (Withdrawal of General Permission to Overseas Corporate Bodies) Regulations, 2003 derecognised OCBs as a class of investor with effect from 16 September 2003. Existing investments could be held and sold, but no fresh investment could be made under the OCB concessions. An entity that was an OCB may now invest only as an ordinary foreign entity under the FDI rules, with the approval required for such cases, and only if it is not under the adverse notice of the RBI or SEBI.

Precision. Do not describe OCBs as a current category. Write: “OCBs were derecognised from 16 September 2003; they are now treated as foreign entities and cannot use the concessions available to NRIs.” Similarly, FIIs are now FPIs under the 2019 Regulations.

How this is examined

For an FII note: definition, entry in 1992, the 1995 Regulations, the change to FPIs in 2014 and 2019, the 10 per cent rule, and significance and volatility. For NRI investment: definition, repatriation and non-repatriation routes, limits, accounts, and the significance points in section 4 (the January 2026 essay wants those last). For OCBs: definition with the 60 per cent test, why they were favoured, why they were derecognised, and the 2003 date.

Now try the real questions: International Trade Economics past question papers.