KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Carriage of goods by air, rail and road, container transport and multimodal transport

International Trade Economics · Unit IV · Topic 17 of 24 · 8 min read

The Warsaw system and the Montreal Convention, 1999 under the Carriage by Air Act, 1972 (air waybill, carrier's liability for cargo, limits, notice and limitation, Trans Mediterranean Airways); carriage by rail under the Railways Act, 1989 and by road under the Carriage by Road Act, 2007; and the legal issues of container transport and the Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993.

On this page
  1. 1. Carriage by air: the conventions
  2. 2. Montreal Convention: cargo rules
  3. 3. Carriage by rail
  4. 4. Carriage by road
  5. 5. Container transport: the legal issues
  6. 6. The Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “Explain the law relating to carriage of goods by air” was the essay in January 2026 and June 2025. “Legal issues relating to container transport” was an essay in August 2024, and “Carriage by rail” a short note in February 2025. For air, the answer is the Montreal Convention as enacted in India; know its cargo Articles by number.

1. Carriage by air: the conventions

The Carriage by Air Act, 1972 gives effect to all three. The First Schedule contains the Warsaw Convention, the Second Schedule the Convention as amended at The Hague, and the Third Schedule, inserted by the amending Act of 2009 (w.e.f. 1 July 2009), the Montreal Convention, applied by section 4A. Which applies depends on whether the States of departure and destination are parties to Montreal, to amended Warsaw or only to original Warsaw. Section 8 allows the Central Government to apply the rules to non-international (domestic) carriage, which it has done by notification.

2. Montreal Convention: cargo rules

In Trans Mediterranean Airways v. Universal Exports, 2011 INSC 689, (2011) 10 SCC 316, an exporter, as consignor, complained against the airline for deficiency in service in the carriage of its consignment. The Supreme Court held that the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission had jurisdiction to entertain the consignor's complaint for deficiency in service, the Carriage by Air Act and the Warsaw rules being applied by the consumer forum and not excluding it.

3. Carriage by rail

Internationally, rail carriage in Europe is governed by COTIF and its CIM Uniform Rules; India is not party, and its cross-border rail trade with Nepal and Bangladesh runs under bilateral arrangements. Domestically, the Railways Act, 1989, Chapter XI, governs the railway administration as carrier:

4. Carriage by road

The Carriage by Road Act, 2007 repealed the Carriers Act, 1865 (section 22). A common carrier (section 2(a)) is a person engaged in collecting, storing, forwarding or distributing goods by goods carriage for all persons without discrimination, including courier and goods-booking companies, but not the Government. Common carriers must be registered (section 3). The consignor executes a goods forwarding note (section 8) and the carrier issues a goods receipt (section 9). The carrier is responsible for loss or damage in transit from any cause except act of God, war, riots, government orders and similar causes (section 17), and in a suit the plaintiff need not prove negligence or a criminal act (section 12(2)). Liability is limited as prescribed unless the consignor pays a higher risk rate (sections 10 and 11). Notice of loss must be served within 180 days of booking (section 16). International road carriage in Europe is under the CMR Convention (1956), to which India is not a party.

5. Container transport: the legal issues

Containerisation since the 1960s made door-to-door carriage normal and created questions the older rules did not answer:

6. The Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993

India's answer is a combined network system. A multimodal transport operator (MTO) must be registered (sections 3 and 4) and issues a multimodal transport document (section 7), which is a document of title if negotiable (section 8). The MTO is liable for loss, damage and delay while the goods are in its charge unless it proves that it, its servants and agents took all reasonable measures (section 13). Where the stage of loss is not known, liability is limited to 2 SDR per kilogram or 666.67 SDR per package, whichever is higher (section 14); where the stage is known, the limit of the law applicable to that mode applies (section 15). Notice of loss is required (section 20), and an action must be brought within nine months (section 24).

Distinguish the documents. A bill of lading is a document of title; an air waybill, a railway receipt in practice, and a road goods receipt are receipts and evidence of contract. A multimodal transport document is a document of title only if issued in negotiable form.

How this is examined

For carriage by air: the Warsaw-Hague-Montreal sequence, the 1972 Act and its Schedules, then the air waybill, Article 18 liability and its four defences, delay, limits, notice, limitation and jurisdiction, with Trans Mediterranean Airways. For container transport: the six issues in section 5 and the 1993 Act. For carriage by rail: section 93 and its exceptions, owner's risk, monetary limit, six-month notice and the Claims Tribunal.

Now try the real questions: International Trade Economics past question papers.