KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Designs law: meaning of design, origin, significance and salient features of the Designs Act, 2000

Intellectual Property Rights II · Unit IV · Topic 12 of 17 · 6 min read

The definition of design in section 2(d) taken element by element, what can and cannot be registered, how designs law developed from the calico printing statutes to the 2000 Act, why design protection matters, and the salient features of the Act.

On this page
  1. 1. Definition: section 2(d)
  2. 2. Origin and development
  3. 3. Significance of design protection
  4. 4. Salient features of the Designs Act, 2000
  5. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

A design is about appearance. The Designs Act protects how a manufactured article looks, its shape, pattern or ornament, and only where the eye judges it. How the article works belongs to patents, who made it to trade marks, and a painting for its own sake to copyright. Learn the definition in section 2(d) phrase by phrase, because every other answer in this unit refers back to it.

1. Definition: section 2(d)

“Design” means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or colours applied to any article, whether in two dimensional or three dimensional or in both forms, by any industrial process or means, whether manual, mechanical or chemical, separate or combined, which in the finished article appeal to and are judged solely by the eye. It does not include:

The elements, taken one by one:

Section 2(g): “original” means originating from the author of the design, and includes cases which, though old in themselves, are new in their application, such as a known pattern applied for the first time to a particular article.

In Bharat Glass Tube Ltd. v. Gopal Glass Works Ltd., 2008 INSC 565, (2008) 10 SCC 657, the Supreme Court explained that a design is to be applied to a finished article and judged solely by the eye, and that the article on which it is to be applied must be named at the time of registration; the two go together. On that basis it upheld the registration of a pattern for glass sheets against a cancellation petition alleging prior publication.

2. Origin and development

3. Significance of design protection

January 2026 set this as a short note.

4. Salient features of the Designs Act, 2000

How this is examined

January 2026 and February 2025 both asked “Define design. Explain the salient features of Design Act, 2000”, and June 2025 “Define design. Discuss the origin and development of design law.” Write the definition in full, explain each element and the exclusions with Bharat Glass, then either section 4 or section 2 above. June 2025’s short note “designs which can be registered” is answered from the definition plus section 4 of the Act.

Now try the real questions: Intellectual Property Rights II past question papers.