KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Author, ownership, term of copyright, rights conferred and moral rights

Intellectual Property Rights II · Unit I · Topic 3 of 17 · 6 min read

Who is the author of each kind of work, who owns copyright first under section 17, how long it lasts, the exclusive rights in section 14, the author's special rights in section 57, and the related rights of performers and broadcasters.

On this page
  1. 1. Who is the author: section 2(d)
  2. 2. First owner: section 17
  3. 3. Term of copyright: sections 22 to 29
  4. 4. Rights conferred: section 14
  5. 5. Moral rights: section 57
  6. 6. Related rights: broadcasters and performers
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

Author and owner are different questions. Section 2(d) tells you who the author is; section 17 tells you who owns the copyright first. Usually they are the same person, but an employer, a newspaper proprietor or a person commissioning a photograph may own what someone else authored. Moral rights under section 57 always stay with the author.

1. Who is the author: section 2(d)

A work of joint authorship (section 2(z)) is one produced by the collaboration of two or more authors in which the contribution of one is not distinct from that of the others.

2. First owner: section 17

The rule is that the author is the first owner. The exceptions, each subject to an agreement to the contrary, are:

The proviso added in 2012 says that for any work incorporated in a cinematograph film, clauses (b) and (c) do not affect the author’s right in the underlying literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work. This was Parliament’s answer to IPRS v. Eastern India Motion Pictures Association, 1977 INSC 87, (1977) 2 SCC 820, where the film producer had been held owner of the music and lyrics commissioned for the film.

3. Term of copyright: sections 22 to 29

The term always runs from the beginning of the following calendar year, so all works of an author who died in 1965 entered the public domain on 1 January 2026.

4. Rights conferred: section 14

For a literary, dramatic or musical work (other than a computer programme), the exclusive right to do or authorise:

For a computer programme, all the above plus selling or giving it on commercial rental. For an artistic work, reproduction (including depiction in three dimensions of a two-dimensional work and vice versa), communication to the public, issuing copies, including it in a film, and adaptation. For a film, making a copy (including a photograph of any image forming part of it), selling or hiring it, and communicating it to the public. For a sound recording, making another recording embodying it, selling or hiring it, and communicating it to the public.

Section 53A adds a resale share right for authors of original paintings, sculptures, drawings and manuscripts where the work is resold for more than ten thousand rupees.

5. Moral rights: section 57

Independently of copyright, and even after assigning it wholly or partly, the author has the right:

Failure to display a work, or to display it to the author’s satisfaction, is not a violation. The right does not cover adaptations of a computer programme permitted by section 52(1)(aa). The legal representatives of the author may exercise it (section 57(2)). The 2012 amendment removed the old limitation that the integrity right could not be enforced after the term of copyright, so it is not limited to the term.

The leading illustration is Amar Nath Sehgal v. Union of India (Delhi High Court, 2005). The sculptor had made a large bronze mural for Vigyan Bhawan. The Government took it down and stored it in a damaged condition. The court held that destruction and mutilation of the work violated his right of integrity, awarded damages, and directed that the remnants be returned to him. The case treats moral rights as part of the author’s personality, which is why they cannot be assigned away.

6. Related rights: broadcasters and performers

How this is examined

June 2025 asked: “Define Author and explain moral rights of author” (10 marks). Write section 2(d) clause by clause, a paragraph distinguishing author from owner with section 17, then section 57 with Amar Nath Sehgal, and end with performers’ moral rights. The term of copyright is a frequent short note; give the table of terms in sentence form as in section 3 above. “Rights conferred by copyright” is answered from section 4.

Now try the real questions: Intellectual Property Rights II past question papers.