KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Holder and holder in due course, parties to instruments, their liability and payment in due course

Banking Law · Unit IV · Topic 14 of 21 · 7 min read

The holder under s.8 and the holder in due course under s.9 with its three conditions, the privileges of a holder in due course (ss.20, 36, 42, 43, 46, 53, 58, 118(g), 120-122), the parties and their capacity, the order and nature of their liability under ss.30-39, and payment in due course under s.10.

On this page
  1. 1. Holder (s.8)
  2. 2. Holder in due course (s.9)
  3. 3. Privileges of a holder in due course
  4. 4. Parties and capacity
  5. 5. Liability of parties
  6. 6. Payment in due course (s.10)
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “Who is a holder in due course? Explain the privileges” is the standard Unit IV essay. Give the three conditions of s.9 precisely, then the privileges as a numbered list of sections. The examiner is checking whether you know that a holder in due course takes free of defects of title but not free of forgery.

1. Holder (s.8)

The holder of a promissory note, bill or cheque is any person entitled in his own name to the possession of it and to receive or recover the amount due on it from the parties. Where it is lost or destroyed, the holder is the person so entitled at the time of loss.

2. Holder in due course (s.9)

“Holder in due course” means any person who for consideration became the possessor of a note, bill or cheque if payable to bearer, or the payee or indorsee if payable to order, before the amount mentioned in it became payable, and without having sufficient cause to believe that any defect existed in the title of the person from whom he derived his title.

The difference: every holder in due course is a holder, but a holder becomes a holder in due course only by meeting these conditions. The holder takes the title of his transferor, with its defects, like an assignee; the holder in due course may take a better title.

3. Privileges of a holder in due course

Trap. A holder in due course is protected against defects in title (fraud, theft, lack of consideration), not against forgery. A forged signature is a nullity; no one can claim through it, however innocent. So a person who takes an order cheque bearing a forged indorsement of the payee is not even a holder. With a bearer cheque no indorsement is needed, so a thief can pass a good title to a holder in due course.

4. Parties and capacity

The parties are defined in s.7: drawer (maker of a bill or cheque), drawee (the person directed to pay), drawee in case of need, acceptor, acceptor for honour, payee; to these add the maker of a note, indorser and indorsee (ss.15–16), and the holder.

5. Liability of parties

6. Payment in due course (s.10)

“Payment in due course” means payment in accordance with the apparent tenor of the instrument, in good faith and without negligence, to any person in possession of it under circumstances which do not afford a reasonable ground for believing that he is not entitled to receive payment.

How this is examined

“Who is a holder in due course? Explain the privileges of a holder in due course” (June 2025); “Who is a holder? Explain the rights of a holder in due course” (February 2025); short note “Holder in due course” (August 2024). Give s.8, s.9 with each condition explained, the holder/holder in due course contrast, then the privileges with section numbers, then the forgery trap. A short note on “payment in due course” or “liability of parties” is answered from sections 5 and 6.

Now try the real questions: Banking Law past question papers.