KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Health and medical insurance

Insurance Law · Unit III · Topic 10 of 17 · 6 min read

The statutory definition of health insurance business after 2025, the difference between health insurance and medical (mediclaim) insurance, the main features of health policies, pre-existing diseases and the moratorium, cashless claims and TPAs, renewal and portability, government schemes, and the disclosure cases.

On this page
  1. 1. Definition
  2. 2. Health insurance and medical insurance distinguished
  3. 3. Features of a health insurance policy
  4. 4. Public health insurance schemes
  5. 5. Disclosure and claims: the cases
  6. 6. Problem
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “Health insurance” is the wider class; “medical insurance” (mediclaim) is one part of it, an indemnity against hospital expenses. The statute now defines health insurance business in s.2(6C) of the Insurance Act (substituted in 2025) to include personal accident and travel insurance. Build the distinction on that definition, then add the disclosure cases (Satwant Kaur, Manmohan Nanda).

1. Definition

Section 2(6C) of the Insurance Act, as substituted by the 2025 amending Act, defines health insurance business as the business of effecting contracts of insurance that provide sickness benefits or pay for medical and health expenses, and includes:

Health insurance is now a separate class of insurance business (s.2(5A)), and an Indian insurance company may be formed with health insurance as its sole purpose (s.2(7A)), which is the basis of the standalone health insurers. General insurers also write health business.

2. Health insurance and medical insurance distinguished

3. Features of a health insurance policy

4. Public health insurance schemes

5. Disclosure and claims: the cases

Health insurance is a contract of utmost good faith, and the state of health is the most material fact. In Satwant Kaur Sandhu v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 2009 INSC 899, (2009) 8 SCC 316, the insured had answered “no” to questions on illness though he suffered from chronic diabetes and renal failure. The repudiation was upheld: for a mediclaim policy the health of the insured is a material fact, and its suppression entitles the insurer to repudiate.

The duty, however, is to disclose what the proposer knows. In Manmohan Nanda v. United India Assurance Co. Ltd., 2021 INSC 826, (2022) 4 SCC 582, the insurer had medically examined the proposer before issuing an overseas mediclaim policy and knew of his diabetes; it later rejected his claim for a heart attack suffered abroad. The Supreme Court held the rejection wrong. An insurer that has examined the proposer and issued the policy cannot repudiate on the basis of a condition it already knew of from its own examination, or one not shown to have been known to the proposer; the object of such a policy is to cover sudden and unforeseen illness.

Public sector insurers must act fairly. In Biman Krishna Bose v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., 2001 INSC 337, (2001) 6 SCC 477, the insurer had refused to renew a mediclaim policy except on terms excluding an illness for which a claim had been paid. The Court held that a nationalised insurer is “State” under Article 12 and must act reasonably even in renewing contracts; it cannot refuse renewal arbitrarily.

6. Problem

S has held a hospitalisation policy for seven years without a break. She is hospitalised for a heart condition. The insurer rejects the claim saying she had not disclosed high blood pressure when she first took the policy. Advise S.

Issue. Whether a health insurer may repudiate for non-disclosure after many years of continuous renewal.

Law. Utmost good faith requires disclosure of material health facts (Satwant Kaur). But IRDAI’s moratorium rule bars contesting a claim for non-disclosure after sixty months of continuous coverage, except for proved fraud; and the insurer must prove the proposer knew the fact (Manmohan Nanda).

Application. Seven years of continuous cover exceeds the moratorium. The insurer can succeed only by proving fraud. Even apart from the moratorium, it would have to show that S knew of the hypertension and that it was material to this risk.

Conclusion. The rejection is not sustainable. S should complain in writing to the insurer’s grievance cell and, failing redress within a month, to the Insurance Ombudsman, or file a consumer complaint.

How this is examined

“Distinguish between health insurance and medical insurance” was the 10-mark question in June 2025. Open with s.2(6C), set out the points of difference in section 2 above, list the features, and end with the cases. A shorter question asks for a note on health insurance in India, where the public schemes in section 4 add marks.

Now try the real questions: Insurance Law past question papers.