KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Exchange and actionable claims

Property Law · Unit IV · Topic 16 of 21 · 6 min read

Exchange under sections 118 to 121, the meaning of an actionable claim in section 3, and how such claims are transferred under sections 130 to 137, with the notice rule, the transferee's position and the exclusions.

On this page
  1. 1. Exchange: section 118
  2. 2. Rights and liabilities in an exchange: sections 119 to 121
  3. 3. Meaning of actionable claim: section 3
  4. 4. Transfer: section 130
  5. 5. Notice and the transferee's position: sections 131 to 134
  6. 6. Special cases and exclusions: sections 135 to 137
  7. 7. Problem
  8. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

Two short chapters. Exchange is a sale in which the price is another thing, and most of its rules borrow from sale. Actionable claims are debts and beneficial interests in movables not in possession; they are the one kind of property the Act lets you transfer by a signed writing alone. Both are usually asked as short notes.

1. Exchange: section 118

When two persons mutually transfer the ownership of one thing for the ownership of another, neither thing or both things being money only, the transaction is called an exchange. A transfer of property in completion of an exchange can be made only in the manner provided for a transfer of such property by sale. So an exchange of immovable property worth one hundred rupees or more needs a registered instrument.

2. Rights and liabilities in an exchange: sections 119 to 121

3. Meaning of actionable claim: section 3

An actionable claim means a claim to any debt, other than a debt secured by mortgage of immovable property or by hypothecation or pledge of movable property, or to any beneficial interest in movable property not in the possession, actual or constructive, of the claimant, which the civil courts recognise as affording grounds for relief, whether such debt or beneficial interest be existent, accruing, conditional or contingent.

Not actionable claims: a mere right to sue for damages for a tort or breach of contract (which cannot be transferred at all, s.6(e)); a decree (governed by Order XXI CPC); a secured debt.

4. Transfer: section 130

The transfer of an actionable claim, with or without consideration, can be made only by an instrument in writing signed by the transferor or his duly authorised agent. It is complete and effectual upon the execution of the instrument, and all the transferor's rights and remedies, whether by way of damages or otherwise, vest in the transferee, whether notice of the transfer is given or not.

The proviso protects the debtor: every dealing by the debtor with the transferor, such as payment to him, is valid against the transfer unless the debtor is a party to the transfer or has received express notice of it. The assignment of a life insurance policy is governed by its own rules in s.38 of the Insurance Act, 1938.

5. Notice and the transferee's position: sections 131 to 134

6. Special cases and exclusions: sections 135 to 137

Trap. The exclusions are in s.137, not s.135. And do not say that notice to the debtor is required to complete the transfer: under s.130 the transfer is complete on execution; notice only stops the debtor from getting a good discharge by paying the transferor.

7. Problem

D owes C Rs 2 lakh on an unsecured loan. C assigns the debt to T by a signed writing. T gives no notice. D, unaware, pays C. T sues D.

Law. Section 130 and its proviso; s.131.

Application. The transfer was complete when the writing was signed, so as between C and T the debt belonged to T. But D paid without express notice, and the proviso protects his payment.

Conclusion. D is discharged. T's remedy is against C, who received money that belonged to T.

How this is examined

Short notes: actionable claim (definition with examples, mode of transfer, notice, s.137 exclusions); exchange (definition and ss.119 to 120). Occasionally a 10-mark question asks to “define actionable claim and explain how it is transferred.” The D, C and T problem is the standard illustration.

Now try the real questions: Property Law past question papers.