KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

General principles of drafting

Drafting, Pleading and Conveyance · Unit I · Topic 1 of 19 · 6 min read

What drafting is, the rules that apply to every legal document, the substantive law that must be known before a word is written, the standard parts of a deed, and how the clinical record and viva are marked.

On this page
  1. 1. Three kinds of drafting
  2. 2. Before drafting: facts, law, purpose
  3. 3. Rules that apply to every document
  4. 4. The standard parts of a deed
  5. 5. Model: a drafting checklist and a clause put right
  6. 6. Interpretation as the drafter s test
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

Drafting is applied law. A plaint, a sale deed and a section of an Act look different, but each is a written instrument meant to produce a legal effect, and each fails for the same reasons: the drafter did not know the facts, did not know the law that governs the document, or wrote words that admit of two meanings. This note sets out the rules common to all three kinds of drafting. The later notes apply them document by document.

1. Three kinds of drafting

The KSLU syllabus for this clinical course (revised from the academic year 2026-27) groups the work in three families.

2. Before drafting: facts, law, purpose

Every exercise begins with three questions, and the draft should not begin until each is answered.

3. Rules that apply to every document

4. The standard parts of a deed

The traditional English form still shapes Indian conveyancing. In order:

  1. Title (“Sale Deed”) and the date and place of execution.
  2. Parties, each fully described, with a short name used thereafter (“hereinafter called the Vendor”).
  3. Recitals (“Whereas” clauses): how the transferor got title and why the deed is being made.
  4. Testatum (“Now this deed witnesses”) and the consideration with its receipt.
  5. Operative words: the words that actually transfer (“the Vendor hereby conveys and transfers”).
  6. Parcels: the property, normally by reference to the Schedule.
  7. Habendum: the extent of the interest (“to have and to hold absolutely”).
  8. Covenants: title, indemnity, further assurance, encumbrances.
  9. Testimonium (“In witness whereof”), signatures and attestation by witnesses.
  10. Schedule of property.

5. Model: a drafting checklist and a clause put right

Illustrative template, not for filing. A clause taken from a student draft and the same clause redrafted.

Before: “The said party shall pay the said amount and/or interest within a reasonable time failing which the other party may take necessary action etc.”

After: “5. Payment. (1) The Borrower shall pay the Lender the principal sum of Rs. 4,00,000 (Rupees Four Lakh only) on or before 31 March 2027. (2) If the Borrower does not pay the whole sum by that date, the Borrower shall pay interest on the unpaid sum at 9 per cent per annum from 1 April 2027 until payment.”

The redraft names who pays whom, fixes the sum in figures and words, replaces “a reasonable time” with a date, removes “and/or” and “etc.”, and drops the empty threat of “necessary action”, since the Lender’s remedy comes from the general law anyway.

Before handing in any exercise, run down this list:

  1. Are all parties fully and consistently described?
  2. Is every legal requirement of the document met (court, form, stamp, signature, attestation, registration, verification)?
  3. Is each paragraph one point, numbered, and in a logical order?
  4. Are amounts and dates in figures and words, and do they agree throughout?
  5. Is any word used in two senses, or any thing called by two names?
  6. Does the prayer or operative part give exactly what the client needs?

6. Interpretation as the drafter’s test

A drafter should read the draft as a hostile reader would: the opponent looking for a gap or a judge deciding between two readings. Aharon Barak’s Purposive Interpretation in Law, the third prescribed reference, explains that courts read a text in the light of its purpose. A drafter who states the purpose clearly (in recitals, a preamble or an objects clause) makes that interpretation work for the client rather than against.

How this is examined

There is no written paper. Under the scheme in Appendix-5 of the KSLU notification, each student prepares 15 drafting exercises (pleadings and legislative drafting, at least 5 of them legislative) worth 45 marks, and 15 conveyancing exercises worth 45 marks, at 3 marks each. At least 5 exercises must apply plain language techniques. The exercises are handwritten on one side of bond paper, bound with a certificate from the course teacher and the Director or Principal that the work is bona fide, and carry a cover page (examination, subject, seat number, centre code) and a content page. A viva-voce of 10 marks at the end of the semester is conducted by the Director or Principal and the course teacher. In the viva, expect questions on the parts of a deed, the difference between “shall” and “may”, and why a draft needs definitions.