KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

The Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 and the Central Rules, 1972

Right to Information · Unit IV · Topic 14 of 16 · 7 min read

Appointment of a commission of inquiry under section 3, its civil court and additional powers, protection of witnesses' statements, the rights of persons whose conduct is inquired into, laying of the report and action taken, the Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules 1972, and Ram Krishna Dalmia (1958) on the nature of a commission.

On this page
  1. 1. Purpose
  2. 2. Appointment: section 3
  3. 3. Powers
  4. 4. Protections and fairness
  5. 5. The Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972
  6. 6. The Supreme Court on commissions
  7. 7. Link with the right to information
  8. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. Three things. Appointment (section 3): who appoints, when it is compulsory, and the bar on parallel commissions. Powers (sections 4, 5, 5A, 5B). Nature: a commission is a fact-finding body whose report binds no one (Ram Krishna Dalmia), but section 3(4) now forces the Government to lay the report with an action-taken memorandum within six months. That last point links the Act to the right to information.

1. Purpose

The Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (60 of 1952) came into force on 1 October 1952. Its Statement of Objects and Reasons explains that commissions and committees had been appointed by executive order without power to enforce attendance of witnesses or production of documents, and that ad hoc laws had been passed for particular inquiries. A general law was needed to let the Government appoint an inquiring authority on any matter of public importance, or when the Legislature demands one, and to give it specific powers. Among well-known commissions under the Act are those into the assassination of Indira Gandhi and of Rajiv Gandhi, the Shah Commission on the Emergency, and many inquiries into communal riots and disasters.

2. Appointment: section 3

3. Powers

Civil court powers, section 4: summoning and enforcing attendance of any person from any part of India and examining him on oath; discovery and production of documents; evidence on affidavit; requisitioning public records from any court or office; issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents; and other prescribed matters.

Additional powers, section 5, which apply only when the appropriate Government so notifies for a particular commission:

Section 5A lets the commission use officers and investigation agencies of the Central or State Government, with that Government’s concurrence, who may summon persons, require documents and requisition records, and who report to the commission, which must satisfy itself about their findings. Section 5B lets it appoint assessors with special knowledge to assist and advise it.

4. Protections and fairness

5. The Commissions of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972

Made under section 12 (G.S.R. 899, 13 July 1972), applying to commissions appointed by the Central Government:

6. The Supreme Court on commissions

In Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S.R. Tendolkar, 1958 INSC 29, AIR 1958 SC 538, the Court upheld the Act and a notification appointing a commission to inquire into the affairs of certain companies. It held the Act within Parliament’s legislative competence and not violative of Article 14, and explained that a commission only inquires and reports: its findings have no force of their own, determine no rights and impose no liabilities, so it does not usurp judicial power. In State of Karnataka v. Union of India, 1977 INSC 214, (1977) 4 SCC 608, a seven-judge bench held that the Central Government could appoint a commission to inquire into allegations of corruption against the sitting Chief Minister and Ministers of Karnataka, and that this did not violate the federal structure.

7. Link with the right to information

A commission’s report is a record held by the Government and so, once laid or once the matter is complete, information under the RTI Act, subject to the exemptions. Section 3(4) was added in 1971 precisely so that Governments could not bury inconvenient reports. Whether a report not yet laid may be withheld is decided under section 8(1)(c) (privilege of the Legislature) and section 8(1)(h) (investigation), not by any general secrecy rule.

How this is examined

“Explain the provision relating to appointment and power of commission under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952” (November 2021) and “salient features of the Commission of Inquiry Act” (December 2020). Write section 3 in full, then sections 4, 5, 5A and 5B, then sections 6, 8B and 8C, and finish with Dalmia. Add rule 5 of the 1972 Rules when the question mentions the Rules.

Now try the real questions: Right to Information past question papers.