KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Civil and criminal administration of justice; primary and secondary functions of courts

Jurisprudence · Unit II · Topic 10 of 24 · 5 min read

Salmond's account of the origin and necessity of the administration of justice, primary and sanctioning rights, the remedies of civil justice, the differences between civil and criminal proceedings, and the secondary functions of courts.

On this page
  1. 1. Origin and necessity
  2. 2. The division into civil and criminal
  3. 3. Primary and sanctioning rights; the civil remedies
  4. 4. Differences between civil and criminal proceedings
  5. 5. Primary functions of courts
  6. 6. Secondary functions of courts
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “Explain the civil and criminal administration of justice and its differences” was set in January 2026 and February 2025. The answer follows Salmond: why the State administers justice at all, the division into civil and criminal, the remedies in each, and a list of differences. “Primary and secondary functions of courts” (June 2025, February 2025) belongs with it and closes this note.

1. Origin and necessity

Salmond defines the administration of justice as “the maintenance of right within a political community by means of the physical force of the State.” In primitive society a person who was wronged took his own revenge, and his kin joined in the feud. The State first regulated private vengeance (fixing the price to be paid instead of blood, the wergild), then replaced it with public justice administered by its own courts.

Why is it necessary? Men are not all just; conflicting interests lead to disputes; and without an impartial authority backed by force, the strong would prevail. Salmond adds that the administration of justice is the primary function of the State, and that a society in which it failed would revert to private war. Hobbes’s state of nature makes the same point.

2. The division into civil and criminal

Every wrong is either a civil wrong or a crime, or both. The test is not the nature of the act but the legal consequence.

The same act may be both. An assault is a crime under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and a tort for which damages lie; defamation is both an offence (section 356 BNS) and a tort; theft is a crime and also conversion.

3. Primary and sanctioning rights; the civil remedies

Salmond distinguishes primary rights (which exist independently of any wrong, such as the right to reputation or to the performance of a contract) from sanctioning rights (which arise from the violation of a primary right, such as the right to damages). Civil justice enforces rights in two ways.

4. Differences between civil and criminal proceedings

Salmond’s own conclusion is that the difference lies in the purpose of the proceedings, not in the nature of the act: civil proceedings aim at the enforcement of rights, criminal proceedings at punishment.

5. Primary functions of courts

The primary function of a court is the administration of justice in the strict sense: deciding disputes between parties (civil justice) and trying and punishing offenders (criminal justice). This involves finding the facts, ascertaining the law, applying it, and enforcing the result.

6. Secondary functions of courts

Courts also do work that is not the decision of disputes or the punishment of crimes, but which they are suited to do because of their procedure and their impartiality. Salmond lists the following.

To these modern writers add the law-making function of courts through precedent (Article 141 makes the law declared by the Supreme Court binding on all courts), advisory jurisdiction (Article 143), and judicial review of legislation and executive action.

Keep primary and secondary apart. A common mistake is to list judicial review and the trial of offences as “secondary” functions. Deciding disputes and punishing crimes are primary. Secondary functions are those where there is no dispute to decide: declaring, administering, supervising and recording.

How this is examined

As a 16- or 10-mark essay: “Explain the civil and criminal administration of justice and its differences” (January 2026, Q.3; February 2025, Q.2(a)); “Explain primary and secondary functions of the court in the administration of justice” (June 2025, Q.2(a)). As a short note: “Secondary functions of court” (February 2025, Q.2(b)). For the first essay give Salmond’s definition, origin and necessity, the remedies, and eight differences in a list. For the second, give primary functions in a paragraph and the five secondary functions with an Indian statute for each.

Now try the real questions: Jurisprudence past question papers.