KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

Pre-reform scenario and the New Economic Policy, 1991

Business Environment · Unit III · Topic 8 of 16 · 5 min read

The planned, licence-controlled economy from 1951 to 1991, the balance of payments crisis of 1991, the objectives and main measures of the New Economic Policy in industry, trade, the external sector, finance and the public sector, and an assessment of its results.

On this page
  1. 1. The pre-reform scenario (1951 1991)
  2. 2. The crisis of 1991
  3. 3. The New Economic Policy
  4. 4. Assessment
  5. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “Explain the New Economic Policy, 1991” was set in January 2026 (16 marks) and June 2025 (10 marks), and “Briefly discuss the pre-reform scenario in India” in June 2025. Answer in three blocks: the old regime and why it failed; the 1991 crisis; the reform measures under liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation. The three components are treated separately in the next note.

1. The pre-reform scenario (1951–1991)

After Independence India chose a mixed economy with a dominant public sector and planned development through Five-Year Plans (the First Plan began in 1951). The model drew on the Mahalanobis strategy of the Second Plan (1956), which stressed heavy industry. Its main features were:

  1. Industrial licensing under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. A licence was needed to start a unit, expand capacity, change location or product.
  2. Dominance of the public sector under the Industrial Policy Resolutions of 1948 and 1956, with 17 industries reserved for the State.
  3. Control of big business under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act, 1969: large houses needed approval for expansion.
  4. Restriction on foreign capital under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973, which generally limited foreign equity to 40 per cent; some multinationals such as Coca-Cola and IBM left India in 1977–78.
  5. Import substitution and protection: high tariffs, quantitative restrictions and import licensing.
  6. Reservation of products for small-scale industry.
  7. Financial repression: nationalisation of 14 banks in 1969 and 6 more in 1980, administered interest rates, and directed credit.
  8. Price and distribution controls on steel, cement, fertiliser, sugar and other goods.

Results. The system built an industrial base, research institutions and self-sufficiency in food after the Green Revolution. But growth averaged about 3.5 per cent a year until 1980, which Professor Raj Krishna called the “Hindu rate of growth”. The “licence-permit raj” bred delay and corruption, public sector units made losses, industry was inefficient and uncompetitive, technology was outdated, and exports stagnated.

2. The crisis of 1991

By 1990–91 the economy faced a severe balance of payments crisis:

3. The New Economic Policy

The government of P.V. Narasimha Rao, with Dr. Manmohan Singh as Finance Minister, announced the New Industrial Policy on 24 July 1991 and presented the reform Budget the same day. The NEP has two parts: stabilisation measures (short-term, to control inflation, the fiscal deficit and the balance of payments) and structural reforms (long-term, to make the economy efficient and competitive), grouped under liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation (LPG).

Objectives

  1. Restore macroeconomic stability and solve the balance of payments crisis.
  2. Raise the rate of growth and make industry internationally competitive.
  3. Replace controls with market forces.
  4. Attract foreign investment and technology.
  5. Reduce the role of the State to areas where it is necessary.
  6. Integrate the Indian economy with the world economy.

Main measures

4. Assessment

Achievements: higher growth; a large rise in foreign exchange reserves; growth of foreign investment; a boom in IT, telecom and services; wider consumer choice; modernisation of industry; and a lower share of controls in daily business.

Criticism: neglect of agriculture; “jobless growth” in organised industry; rising inequality between regions and income groups; pressure on small industries from imports and multinationals; disinvestment at low prices; and greater exposure to global shocks.

How this is examined

January 2026 (100 marks) set “Explain the New Economic Policy 1991” for 16 marks; June 2025 set “Explain the New Economic Policy in detail” (10 marks) and the pre-reform scenario as a 6-mark note. For the pre-reform note use the eight features of section 1 and two lines on results; for the NEP use background, objectives, measures in heads, and assessment.

Now try the real questions: Business Environment past question papers.