KSLU Corner™ New AIBE previous QP

The Advocates Act, 1961: salient features and the Bar Councils

Professional Ethics · Unit I · Topic 4 of 18 · 5 min read

The structure of the Advocates Act chapter by chapter, the constitution and functions of the State Bar Councils and the Bar Council of India, senior advocates, pre-audience, the single class of advocates and the 2023 amendment on touts.

On this page
  1. 1. Object and background
  2. 2. The structure of the Act
  3. 3. Salient features
  4. 4. Functions of a State Bar Council (section 6)
  5. 5. Functions of the Bar Council of India (section 7)
  6. 6. Senior advocates
  7. How this is examined
Cases checked to exist. Read the judgment before quoting a holding.

Every case cited here has been checked to exist — the citation resolves and names the right parties. The propositions attributed to each case have not been verified line by line against the judgment. Case names link through to the full judgment: read it before quoting a holding in an examination answer, and never carry a proposition from notes into court on trust.

The examinable core. “State the salient features of the Advocates Act, 1961” appears in nearly every paper (June 2017, December 2017, June 2018, December 2018). Organise the answer by the Act’s own chapters, and give the section number for every feature. “Functions of the Bar Council of India” (December 2017) is answered from section 7.

1. Object and background

The Act was passed to “amend and consolidate the law relating to legal practitioners and to provide for the constitution of Bar Councils and an All-India Bar”. It implemented the recommendations of the All India Bar Committee (1951) and the Fourteenth Law Commission Report (1958). Before 1961 there were several classes of practitioners (advocates, vakils, pleaders, mukhtars, attorneys) under different laws, and discipline lay with the High Courts.

2. The structure of the Act

3. Salient features

4. Functions of a State Bar Council (section 6)

5. Functions of the Bar Council of India (section 7)

Its powers of supervision are backed by section 48A (revision of State Bar Council orders from which no appeal lies) and section 48B (directions to State Bar Councils). Its rule-making power under section 49 was held wide enough to support a qualifying examination in Bar Council of India v. Bonnie Foi Law College, 2023 INSC 116, but not wide enough to impose an age limit for enrolment: Indian Council of Legal Aid and Advice v. Bar Council of India, 1995 INSC 41, (1995) 1 SCC 732.

6. Senior advocates

Section 16(3) lets the Bar Council of India restrict the practice of senior advocates. Chapter I of Part VI of its Rules provides that a senior advocate shall not file a vakalat or act without an advocate on record, shall not draft pleadings or affidavits or do conveyancing, and shall not accept a brief directly from a client. The process of designation was regulated by guidelines in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2017), modified in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India, 2023 INSC 524, (2023) 8 SCC 1, and revisited again in Jitender @ Kalla v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2025 INSC 667, which reconsidered the point-based assessment and the role of the Permanent Committee under section 16(2).

Pending reform. Draft amendments to the Advocates Act have been circulated in recent years. None has been enacted. Answer on the Act as it stands, with the 2023 amendment.

How this is examined

The “salient features” answer should run: object and background; the chapter plan; then ten or so features, each tied to a section (sections 3, 4, 16, 17, 23, 24, 29, 30, 35–38, 45, 45A, 49). For “functions of the Bar Council of India”, reproduce section 7 clause by clause and add sections 48A, 48B and 49, with Bonnie Foi on the scope of the rule-making power.

Now try the real questions: Professional Ethics past question papers.