discovery statement
A confession to a police officer is inadmissible (s.23(1) BSA, old s.25 Evidence Act), and so is one made in police custody unless before a Magistrate (s.23(2), old s.26). The proviso to s.23(2) BSA (old s.27) is an exception: when a fact is discovered in consequence of information received from an accused in police custody, so much of the information as relates distinctly to the fact discovered may be proved, whether or not it amounts to a confession.
In Pulukuri Kottaya the Privy Council held that the “fact discovered” includes the place from which the object is produced and the accused's knowledge of it, not the object alone. So “I will show you where I hid the knife” is admissible, but “with which I stabbed him” is not.
Example
Only the words “I hid the knife under the culvert” are admissible as a discovery statement; the confession of stabbing must be excluded.
In Indian law
- Proviso to s.23(2) BSA (old s.27 Evidence Act)
- Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor (Privy Council, 1947): meaning of “fact discovered”
See also
extra-judicial confession · evidence
Read more in the study notes
- Need for ADR, international commitments and suitability of disputes (Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems)
- Negotiation: meaning, styles and approaches (Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems)
- History and evolution of banking in India (Banking Law)
- The Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961 (Banking Law)
- Banking as a service: consumer protection and the RBI Ombudsman (Banking Law)
- Lending by banks: principles, priority sector, securities, interest and penalty (Banking Law)